Alsaraf v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services
Zeinab Alsaraf and Warmann |
Sedgwick Claims Management Services |
1:2024cv00323 |
February 2, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Gordon P Gallagher |
N Reid Neureiter |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1101 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 MINUTE ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Dkt. #11 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) on or before April 3, 2024. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 3/21/2024.(ccuen, ) |
Filing 12 MEMORANDUM regarding #11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Sedgwick Claims Management Services. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 3/20/2024. Text Only Entry. (ccuen, ) |
Filing 11 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Andrews, Ann-Martha) |
Filing 10 MINUTE ORDER. It is hereby ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Complaint (Dkt. #7 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (Dkt. #1 ) on or before March 20, 2024. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 2/21/2024.(ccuen, ) |
Filing 9 MEMORANDUM regarding #7 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, filed by Sedgwick Claims Management Services. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 2/21/2024. Text Only Entry. (ccuen, ) |
Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Sedgwick, L.P., Corporate Parent Lightning Cayman Merger Sub, Ltd, Corporate Parent Sedgwick Global Inc., Other Affiliate Stone Point Capital, Other Affiliate La Caisse de dpt et placement du Qubec (CDPQ), Other Affiliate CP Encore Holdings, L.P., Other Affiliate Onex Peppermint Limited Partnership for Sedgwick Claims Management Services. (Andrews, Ann-Martha) |
Filing 7 Stipulated MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint, by Defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Andrews, Ann-Martha) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Zeinab Alsaraf. Sedgwick Claims Management Services served on 2/7/2024, answer due 2/28/2024. (Bulger, Thomas) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE Plaintiff shall promptly serve Defendant. A Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) shall be held on: April 25, 2024 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. The parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (571) 353-2301, Access Code 841686937# at the scheduled time. If this date is not convenient for any counsel/pro se party, he/she should confer with opposing counsel/pro se party and file a motion to reschedule the conference to a more convenient date. Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling any appearance in this court will be entertained unless a motion is filed no less than FIVE (5) business days in advance of the date of appearance. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 2/2/2024. (norlin, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution. by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 2/2/2024. (sphil, ) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to District Judge Gordon P Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sedgwick Claims Management Services (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9521312)Attorney Thomas A. Bulger added to party Zeinab Alsaraf(pty:pla), filed by Zeinab Alsaraf. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons proposed Summons)(Bulger, Thomas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.