Bircham et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
| Paul Bircham and Quinn Bircham |
| Safeco Insurance Company of America |
| 1:2024cv00422 |
| February 13, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Gordon P Gallagher |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 2/14/2025. Dispositive Motions due by 3/17/2025. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 4/12/2024. (evaug)
|
| Filing 18 REPLY to Response to #9 MOTION to Strike Certain of Defendant's Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(f) filed by Plaintiffs Paul Bircham, Quinn Bircham. (Archuleta, Nathanael) |
| Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America and by Plaintiffs Paul Bircham, Quinn Bircham. (Archuleta, Nathanael) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION to Strike Certain of Defendant's Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(f) filed by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Cheong, Holly) |
|
Filing 15
MINUTE ORDER: granting Defendant's #13 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Motion to Strike. Defendant's deadline to file a response to the #9 Motion to Strike is extended to April 8, 2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 04/04/2024. Text Only Entry(mdblc4,)
|
| Filing 14 MEMORANDUM regarding #13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Strike Certain of Defendant's Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(f) filed by Safeco Insurance Company of America. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell, by District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 4/4/2024. Text Only Entry (schap, ) |
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #9 MOTION to Strike Certain of Defendant's Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(f) by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Cheong, Holly) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER REFERRING CASE to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other specifically-referred motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. By District Judge Gordon P Gallagher on 3/28/2024. Text Only Entry. (ccuen, )
|
| Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED pursuant to #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to District Judge Gordon P Gallagher and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-00422-GPG. (Text Only Entry) (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant Safeco Insurance Company of America All parties do not consent.. (Cheong, Holly) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Strike Certain of Defendant's Affirmative Defenses Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(f) by Plaintiffs Paul Bircham, Quinn Bircham. (Archuleta, Nathanael) |
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc. for Safeco Insurance Company of America. (Cheong, Holly) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Holly C. White on behalf of Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaAttorney Holly C. White added to party Safeco Insurance Company of America(pty:dft) (White, Holly) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Holly E. Cheong on behalf of Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaAttorney Holly E. Cheong added to party Safeco Insurance Company of America(pty:dft) (Cheong, Holly) |
| Filing 5 DEFENDANT'S ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Attorney Brian John Spano added to party Safeco Insurance Company of America(pty:dft) by Safeco Insurance Company of America.(Spano, Brian) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Consent Form due by 4/10/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 4/10/2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 2/14/2024. (evaug)
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (blaws) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Safeco Insurance Company of America (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9538791)Attorney Nathanael Thomas Archuleta added to party Paul Bircham(pty:pla), Attorney Nathanael Thomas Archuleta added to party Quinn Bircham(pty:pla), filed by Paul Bircham, Quinn Bircham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Archuleta, Nathanael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
