Garcia (PS) v. Anderson et al
| Miguel Antonio Garcia |
| James Anderson, Clark Smith, City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, Colorado Springs Police Department, Com-Core, Edith Smith, April Tolives, Youngblood, Connie Pagel, Todd Murrey, Mathew Waldera, Andrew Anderson, Mathew Davidson, Drew Jelts, Nathanal Fierce, Kyle Gehike, Troy Bauer, Evan Strauss, Daniel Summey, Beth Gibson, Conor Flanigan, Peter McNeilly, David Booth, Samuel Sheppard, Spencer Grove, Randy Yoder, City of Denver, Colo., Bryan Vandermeer, Mark Morgan, Andrew Cross, Michael Kim, Conni Crook, Marlenye Porras, Don Calvano, Dylan Cavin, Kyle Swing, Greg Sadar, Commerce City Police Deparment, City of Commerce City, Colorado and C.S.P.D. Officer |
| 1:2024cv00433 |
| February 12, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Petition to Cure Deficiencies/Amend/Alter, by Plaintiff Miguel Antonio Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document)(angar, ) |
| Filing 13 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Andrew Anderson, James Anderson, Troy Bauer, David Booth, C.S.P.D. Officer, Don Calvano, Dylan Cavin, City of Colorado Springs, Colorado, City of Commerce City, Colorado, City of Denver, Colo., Colorado Springs Police Department, Com-Core, Commerce City Police Deparment, Conni Crook, Andrew Cross, Mathew Davidson, Nathanal Fierce, Conor Flanigan, Kyle Gehike, Beth Gibson, Spencer Grove, Drew Jelts, Michael Kim, Peter McNeilly, Mark Morgan, Todd Murrey, Connie Pagel, Marlenye Porras, Greg Sadar, Samuel Sheppard, Clark Smith(and Officer John Doe Colorado Springs P.D.), Clark Smith, Edith Smith, Evan Strauss, Daniel Summey, Kyle Swing, April Tolives, Bryan Vandermeer, Mathew Waldera, Randy Yoder, Youngblood, filed by Miguel Antonio Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Envelope)(cmadr, ) |
Filing 12
Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 13 March 2024. Plaintiff's March 8, 2024, Motion to Amend (ECF No. 10) is denied as unnecessary. On March 11, 2024, Plaintiff was ordered to cure filing deficiencies by filing a Prisoner Complaint on the current (revised November 2022) Prisoner Complaint form. (See ECF No. #11 ). The form has been mailed to Plaintiff. Thus, Plaintiff must file a cured pleading without an accompanying motion to amend within the time allowed if he wishes to pursue claims in this action. Plaintiff may include any appropriate claims in his cured pleading. This action may be dismissed without further notice if Plaintiff fails to file a cured pleading within the time allowed. (cmadr, )
|
Filing 11
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 11 March 2024. ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall obtain and utilize the current, court-approved Prisoner Complaint form (revised November 2022) which is available, along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. The Clerk of the Court is directed to mail one copy of the Prisoner Complaint form to Plaintiff for his use. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's two motions to amend (ECF Nos. #5 , #7 ) are denied as unnecessary. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #6 ) is denied as moot because Plaintiff paid the filing fee. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Request for Production of Documents and Request for Admission (ECF No. #8 ) is denied as premature because this case is in initial review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #9 ) is denied without prejudice as premature because this case is in initial review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1. (Forms mailed as ordered.) (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Miguel Antonio Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint)(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Miguel Antonio Garcia. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 8 Request for Production of Documents and Request for Admission by Plaintiff Miguel Antonio Garcia. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Miguel Antonio Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Complaint)(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 6 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Miguel Antonio Garcia. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Miguel Antonio Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document, #2 Proposed Document)(cmadr, ) |
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 405.00, receipt number 109771 (cmadr, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 2/13/2024. (ccuen, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (tgall, ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against James Anderson, Clark Smith, filed by Miguel Antonio Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tgall, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.