Sorell v. Secura Supreme Insurance Company et al
Reagan Sorell |
Secura Supreme Insurance Company and Secura Insurance Company |
1:2024cv00599 |
March 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Susan Prose |
Regina M Rodriguez |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
Filing 26 MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 4/15/2024. FTR: C205. (trvo, ) |
|
Filing 25 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Reagan Sorell. (Breuer, Jessica) |
Filing 24 ANSWER to #3 Complaint and Jury Demand by Secura Supreme Insurance Company.(Hertzke, Billy-George) |
|
|
Filing 21 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Defendant Secura Supreme Insurance Company. (Ross, Kathrina) |
Filing 20 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 3/28/2024 that the #12 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss Party Defendant Secura Insurance Company without Prejudice be granted pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) (voluntary dismissal) or 21 (permitting the court on motion or sua sponte to drop a party). See Casady v. Cherry Creek Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., No. 21-cv-02542-CMA-NYW, 2022 WL 3109569, at *2 (D. Colo. June 15, 2022), report and recommendation adopted, 2022 WL 3099144 (D. Colo. Aug. 4, 2022) (noting uncertainty in the Tenth Circuit concerning which rule applies when a plaintiff voluntarily dismisses one of multiple defendants). Text Only Entry (sbplc1) |
Filing 19 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kathrina Rae Murphy Ross on behalf of Secura Supreme Insurance CompanyAttorney Kathrina Rae Murphy Ross added to party Secura Supreme Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Ross, Kathrina) |
|
|
Filing 16 CASE REASSIGNED. Pursuant to #15 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. All parties do not consent. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez Blackburn and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-00599-RMR. (Text Only Entry) (sphil, ) |
Filing 15 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Reagan Sorell All parties do not consent.. (Breuer, Jessica) |
|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jessica L. Breuer on behalf of Reagan SorellAttorney Jessica L. Breuer added to party Reagan Sorell(pty:pla) (Breuer, Jessica) |
Filing 12 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss Party Defendant Secura Insurance Company without Prejudice by Defendant Secura Insurance Company. (Hertzke, Billy-George) |
|
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond by Defendant Secura Supreme Insurance Company. (Hertzke, Billy-George) |
|
Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Dustin Priebe on behalf of Reagan SorellAttorney Dustin Priebe added to party Reagan Sorell(pty:pla) (Priebe, Dustin) |
Filing 7 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (blaws) |
Filing 6 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
Filing 5 AFFIDAVITS of Service of Summons, Complaint and Jury Demand, Civil Case Cover Sheet upon Secura Supreme Insurance Company, Secura Insurance Company on 02/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 in re Secura Insurance Company) (blaws) |
Filing 4 AFFIDAVITS of Service of Summons, Complaint and Jury Demand, Civil Case Cover Sheet upon Secura Supreme Insurance Company, Secura Insurance Company on 02/13/2024. (Attachments: #1 in re Secura Insurance Company) (blaws) |
Filing 3 STATE COURT COMPLAINT and Jury Demand against Secura Insurance Company, Secura Supreme Insurance Company, filed by Reagan Sorell. (blaws) |
Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (blaws) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Secura Insurance Company, Secura Supreme Insurance Company from District Court, Douglas County, Case Number 2024CV30132. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-9571690), filed by Secura Insurance Company, Secura Supreme Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit C - Civil Summons (SECURA Supreme), #4 Exhibit D - Civil Summons (SECURA Insurance), #5 Exhibit E - Delay Reduction Order, #6 Exhibit F - Return of Service (SECURA Supreme 2.13), #7 Exhibit G - Return of Service (SECURA 2.13), #8 Exhibit H - Return of Service (SECURA Supreme 2.19), #9 Exhibit I - Return of Service (SECURA 2.19), #10 Exhibit J - Voting Record, #11 Exhibit K - Property Record, #12 Exhibit L - NAIC, #13 Exhibit M - NAIC, #14 Civil Cover Sheet, #15 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet, #16 State Court Pleading Index, #17 Certification that "Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal" was Filed with State Court, #18 Corporate Disclosure Statement)(Hertzke, Billy-George) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.