Arato v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.
David Arato |
Experian Information Solutions Inc. |
1:2024cv00901 |
April 3, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Regina M Rodriguez |
Scott T Varholak |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew Sugaya Robertson on behalf of David AratoAttorney Matthew Sugaya Robertson added to party David Arato(pty:pla) (Robertson, Matthew) |
Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/3/2024. Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/16/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 5/23/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (schap, ) |
Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 4/3/2024. Text Only Entry (kmyha) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (ykare, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (ykare, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions Inc. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9620300)Attorney Alan Joseph Stecklein added to party David Arato(pty:pla), filed by David Arato. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Stecklein, Alan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Arato v. Experian Information Solutions Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Arato | |
Represented By: | Matthew Sugaya Robertson |
Represented By: | Alan Joseph Stecklein |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.