Arato v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Plaintiff: David Arato
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Case Number: 1:2024cv00901
Filed: April 3, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Matthew Sugaya Robertson on behalf of David AratoAttorney Matthew Sugaya Robertson added to party David Arato(pty:pla) (Robertson, Matthew)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 4/3/2024. Joint Proposed Scheduling Order due 5/16/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 5/23/2024 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (schap, )
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 4/3/2024. Text Only Entry (kmyha)
April 3, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (ykare, )
April 3, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (ykare, )
April 3, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions Inc. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9620300)Attorney Alan Joseph Stecklein added to party David Arato(pty:pla), filed by David Arato. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Stecklein, Alan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arato v. Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Arato
Represented By: Matthew Sugaya Robertson
Represented By: Alan Joseph Stecklein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Experian Information Solutions Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?