McKinney (PS) v. People of the State of Colorado, The
Kevin Lewayne McKinney and Kevin L. McKinney |
People of the State of Colorado, The |
1:2024cv00954 |
April 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Susan Prose |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING MR. MCKINNEY TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ORDERED that Mr. McKinney cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty days from the date of this Order. Any papers that he files in response to this Order must include the civil action number on this Order. If Mr. McKinney fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 4/9/2024. (dgumb, ) |
Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Petitioner Kevin Lewayne McKinney. (tgall, ) |
Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. text only entry. (tgall, ) |
Filing 1 Petition to Vacate Void Judgement Pursuant to Colo.R.CIVP.60(b)(3)(5) by Petitioner Kevin Lewayne McKinney (Attachments: #1 Addendum to Petition, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Envelope) (tgall, ) Modified to corrected docket date on 4/9/2024 (tgall, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.