Gearhart v. University of Colorado Colorado Springs, et al
| Kristen Gearhart |
| University of Colorado Colorado Springs, Regents of the University of Colorado, The, Mark Tomforde, Zachary Mesyan, Gene Abrams, Rex Welshon, Lynn Vidler, Tom Christensen, Kelli Klebe, Venkat Reddy, Laura Emmot and Mark Kennedy |
| 1:2024cv00976 |
| April 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CASE REASSIGNED. This case was originally assigned incorrectly, therefore has been randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-976-MDB. (Text only entry.) (bcroc, ) |
| Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No summons issued. (bcroc, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry (bcroc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9631749)Attorney Paul M. Linnenburger added to party Kristen Gearhart(pty:pla), filed by Kristen Gearhart. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Linnenburger, Paul) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
