Chrome Hearts, LLC v. Crocs Retail, LLC
Plaintiff: CHROME HEARTS LLC and Chrome Hearts, LLC
Defendant: Crocs Retail LLC
Case Number: 1:2024cv00979
Filed: April 11, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Kathryn A Starnella
Referring Judge: Nina Y Wang
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2024 Filing 12 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to 11 Minute Order. Text Only Entry. (jtorr, )
April 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the #10 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice, which is a self-effectuating notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i). Plaintiff's claims were dismissed without prejudice as of the filing of the Notice. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate this case accordingly. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/17/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc5, )
April 17, 2024 Filing 10 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case without Prejudice by Plaintiff Chrome Hearts, LLC (Blakely, Brent)
April 17, 2024 Filing 9 Utility Setting/Resetting Deadlines/Hearings, pursuant to the Order Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference dated April 12, 2024: Scheduling Conference set for 7/10/2024 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (ebuch)
April 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTINGSCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 4/12/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due7/2/2024 Scheduling Conference set for 7/10/2024 10:00 AM in Courtroom C204 before Judge Nina Y. Wang. (Attachments: #1 Instruction for Preparation of Scheduling Order, #2 Scheduling Order, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (norlin, )
April 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 04/12/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc5, )
April 12, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, )
April 11, 2024 Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (efoga, )
April 11, 2024 Filing 4 Administrative Notice: Notice to filer of non-compliance with Patent, Trademark, or Copyright Action case opening procedures. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party commencing the action to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.1. Please file a properly completed Report form, which can be found on the courts website. (efoga, )
April 11, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Crocs Retail LLC re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff CHROME HEARTS LLC. (Blakely, Brent)
April 11, 2024 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent CHROME HEARTS LLC for CHROME HEARTS LLC. (Blakely, Brent)
April 11, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Crocs Retail LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9633069)Attorney Brent H Blakely added to party CHROME HEARTS LLC(pty:pla), filed by CHROME HEARTS LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Blakely, Brent)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chrome Hearts, LLC v. Crocs Retail, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CHROME HEARTS LLC
Represented By: Brent H Blakely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chrome Hearts, LLC
Represented By: Brent H Blakely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crocs Retail LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?