Davis (PS) v. City of Aurora et al
Lewis Davis, Jr. |
City of Aurora, Brandon Vickrey, David Waller and Tony Cancino |
1:2024cv01081 |
April 18, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Susan Prose |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. Plaintiff cure the deficiency designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure the designated deficiency within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 4/22/2024. (ccuen, ) |
Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Tony Cancino, City of Aurora, Brandon Vickrey, David Waller, filed by Lewis Davis, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (blaws) |
Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form), by Plaintiff Lewis Davis, Jr. (blaws) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tony Cancino, City of Aurora, Brandon Vickrey, David Waller, filed by Lewis Davis, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (blaws) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.