Medina v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Wilfred Medina
Defendant: Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Case Number: 1:2024cv01398
Filed: May 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Maritza Dominguez Braswell
Referring Judge: S Kato Crews
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 5/16/2025. Dispositive Motions due by 6/16/2025. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 7/15/2024. (evaug )
July 15, 2024 Filing 13 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. (Engel, Madison)
May 21, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/15/2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 5/21/2024. (evaug)
May 21, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Micah L. Larson on behalf of Wilfred MedinaAttorney Micah L. Larson added to party Wilfred Medina(pty:pla) (Larson, Micah)
May 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/20/2024. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
May 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/20/2024. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
May 17, 2024 Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (blaws)
May 17, 2024 Filing 7 Case assigned to U.S. District Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (blaws)
May 17, 2024 Filing 6 STATE COURT ANSWER and Jury Demand to #5 Complaint by Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. (blaws)
May 17, 2024 Filing 5 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, filed by Wilfred Medina. (blaws)
May 17, 2024 Filing 4 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (blaws)
May 17, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Rebecca Kirsten Wagner on behalf of Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance CompanyAttorney Rebecca Kirsten Wagner added to party Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Wagner, Rebecca)
May 17, 2024 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Engel, Madison)
May 17, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company from Alamosa District Court, Case Number 2024CV30015. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-9692675), filed by Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-State Court Complaint, #2 Exhibit A-State Court Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit A-State Court Summons, #4 Exhibit A-State Court Correspondence from Court Clerk, #5 Exhibit A-State Court Delay Reduction Order, #6 Exhibit A-State Court Order Re Official Record and Use of Court Reporters, #7 Exhibit A-State Court Defendant's Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Jury Demand, #8 Exhibit B-Voter Registration Information, #9 Exhibit C-Traffic Accident Report, #10 Exhibit D-Allstate's Illinios Secretary of State Periodic Report, #11 Register of Actions, #12 Civil Cover Sheet, #13 Supplemental Civil Cover Sheet)(Engel, Madison)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Represented By: Madison Engel
Represented By: Rebecca Kirsten Wagner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilfred Medina
Represented By: Micah L. Larson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?