Tolliver (PS) v. Knowells et al
| Kamilah Tolliver |
| Beyonce Knowells, Usher Raymond, Mattew Knowells, Ticket master and Live Nation Tours |
| 1:2024cv01413 |
| May 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appeal Trial Civil Rights Violation by Plaintiff Kamilah Tolliver. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order of Dismissal on 5/23/2024. (angar, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER of Dismissal. Application to Proceed in District Court Without PrepayingFees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #3 ) is granted. leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/23/2024. (angar, )
|
| Filing 3 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs, by Plaintiff Kamilah Tolliver. (ykare, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (ykare, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Beyonce Knowells, Mattew Knowells, Live Nation Tours, Usher Raymond, Ticket master, filed by Kamilah Tolliver.(ykare, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
