Gibbs (PS) v. Nowlin et al
Petitioner: Aaron Gibbs
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The and Steven Nowlin
Case Number: 1:2024cv01442
Filed: May 21, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Susan Prose
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 07/01/2024. Petitioner's motion for extension of time (ECF No. #4 ) is GRANTED and Petitioner shall have up to and including July 29, 2024, to cure the deficiencies as directed in the Court's May 28, 2024 Order Directing Petitioner to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #3 ). Petitioner is reminded that the action will be dismissed without further notice if he fails to cure the remaining deficiencies within the time allowed.(jrobe, )
July 1, 2024 Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 111051. (jrobe, )
June 28, 2024 Filing 5 AMENDED APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus 28 U.S.C. 2254, filed by Aaron Gibbs.(jrobe, )
June 28, 2024 Filing 4 MOTION for Extension of Time or continuance by Petitioner Aaron Gibbs. (jrobe, )
May 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 05/27/2024. It is ORDERED that Petitioner cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Petitioner files in response to this order must be labeled with the civil action number identified on this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall obtain and utilize the following District of Colorado forms: (1) Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254, and (2) Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (with the assistance of a case manager or the facility's legal assistant), which are available, along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if Petitioner fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. (jrobe, )
May 21, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws)
May 21, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION Under 28 USC 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Aaron Gibbs. (blaws)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gibbs (PS) v. Nowlin et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Steven Nowlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Aaron Gibbs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?