Tolliver (PS) v. Bailey et al
| Kamilah Tolliver |
| Yvette Bailey, Hampden Town Center and First Floor Neighbors |
| 1:2024cv01462 |
| May 23, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order of Dismissal. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 05/29/2024. It is ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. 2) is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint (ECF No. 1) and the action are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous, malicious, and abusive. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) by Plaintiff Kamilah Tolliver. (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Yvette Bailey, First Floor Neighbors, Hampden Town Center, filed by Kamilah Tolliver.(efoga, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
