Contreras (PS) v. State of Colorado, The
Plaintiff: Darren Contreras
Defendant: State of Colorado, The
Case Number: 1:2024cv01697
Filed: June 17, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Richard Thomas Gurley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2024 Filing 9 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 2 August 2024. For the reasons set forth herein, this Magistrate Judge respectfully RECOMMENDS that the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8. (cmadr, )
August 1, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1 August 2024. (cmadr, )
July 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Minute ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 31 July 2024. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (cmadr, )
June 28, 2024 Filing 6 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Darren Contreras in the amount of $ 4.20; Receipt Number 111034. (cmadr, )
June 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 25 June 2024. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, an amended Prisoner Complaint on the court-approved Prisoner Complaint form that complies with all directives contained in this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to file an amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with this order within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice. (cmadr, )
June 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 24 June 2024. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Orderto DOC_inmateaccounts@state.co.us. (Mailed as ordered)(cmadr, )
June 17, 2024 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley. Text Only Entry (efoga, )
June 17, 2024 Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Darren Contreras. (efoga, )
June 17, 2024 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against State of Colorado, The, filed by Darren Contreras.(efoga, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Contreras (PS) v. State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darren Contreras
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?