DiPasquale v. Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors et al
| Christiano DiPasquale |
| Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors and Harvest Meat Company |
| 1:2024cv01822 |
| June 28, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Christiano DiPasquale. Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors waiver sent on 7/22/2024, answer due 9/20/2024. (Gerni, Renee) |
| Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Christiano DiPasquale. Harvest Meat Company waiver sent on 7/22/2024, answer due 9/20/2024. (Gerni, Renee) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (blaws) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Collective Action Complaint against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9754555)Attorney Renee Marie Gerni added to party Christiano DiPasquale(pty:pla), filed by Christiano DiPasquale. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A - Consent to Join Form CDiPasquale, #2 Summons Summons for Harvest Sherwood Food Distributors, #3 Summons Summons for Harvest Meat Company, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(Gerni, Renee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
