Larson (PS) v. Stucker et al
| Kevin A. Larson |
| Shane Stucker and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2024cv01979 |
| July 15, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #7 Order, Pre-Answer Response by Respondents Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Shane Stucker. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit)(Lanni, Brian) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Brian M. Lanni on behalf of Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Shane StuckerAttorney Brian M. Lanni added to party Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The(pty:res), Attorney Brian M. Lanni added to party Shane Stucker(pty:res) (Lanni, Brian) |
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 08/23/2024. Petitioner's handwritten Prisoner Motion for Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. #11 ] is denied without prejudice. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 11 PRISONER MOTION for Appointment Counsel by Petitioner Kevin A. Larson. (pklin, ) |
| Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Shane Stucker waiver sent on 8/20/2024, answer due 10/21/2024. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 9 Acknowledgment Letter re: ECF #8 Certificate of Service from the OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO on 8/20/2024 (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #7 Order and #1 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus for Service of Process. (cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO FILE PRE-ANSWER RESPONSE by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 19 August 2024. ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order Respondents shall file a pre-answer response that complies with this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the pre-answer response Petitioner may file a reply. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 6 Filing fee: $5.00, receipt number 111421. (pklin, ) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 07/19/2024. ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must pay the full $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee within the time allowed, the habeas corpus application may be denied and the action dismissed without further notice. FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. #3 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as premature. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 4 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley. Text Only Entry. (blaws) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER MOTION for Appointment of Counsel, by Petitioner Kevin A. Larson. (blaws) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, by Petitioner Kevin A. Larson. (blaws) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Kevin A. Larson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (blaws) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
