Walker v. Foreman
Plaintiff: Arthur Walker
Defendant: Foreman
Case Number: 1:2024cv02150
Filed: August 2, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Michael E Hegarty
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2024 Filing 25 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Christopher Lockefeer on behalf of Foreman (Lockefeer, Mark)
September 25, 2024 Filing 24 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Kristin K. Lindemann on behalf of ForemanAttorney Kristin K. Lindemann added to party Foreman(pty:dft) (Lindemann, Kristin)
September 5, 2024 Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #22 Minute Order. Mailed to Arthur Walker #61612 Bent County Correctional Facility (BCCF) 11560 Road FF75 Las Animas, CO 81054-9573 (dgumb, )
September 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's "Motion to order District Court to issue Summons on Defendant Foreman." ECF #21 . The one-sentence Motion requests the Court issue a summons on Defendant "so that it don't prejudice Plaintiff claims." Id. On August 28, 2024, the Clerk of Court served a summons on Defendant. ECF #13 . Defendant waived service on that date, and his response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due October 28, 2024. ECF #19 . As a summons has already been issued, Plaintiff's Motion [ECF #21 ] is denied as moot. Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/5/2024.(dgumb, )
September 3, 2024 Filing 21 MOTION to Order District Court to Issue Summons on Defendant Foreman, by Plaintiff Arthur Walker. (sphil, )
August 29, 2024 Filing 20 CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #19 Waiver of Service Executed. Mailed to Arthur Walker #61612 Bent County Correctional Facility (BCCF) 11560 Road FF75 Las Animas, CO 81054-9573 (dgumb, )
August 28, 2024 Filing 19 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Foreman waiver sent on 8/28/2024, answer due 10/28/2024. (dgumb, )
August 28, 2024 Filing 18 CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #17 Order. Mailed to Arthur Walker #61612 Bent County Correctional Facility (BCCF) 11560 Road FF75 Las Animas, CO 81054-9573 (dgumb, )
August 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that [ECF #9 ] Plaintiff's "Motion for Appointment of Counsel" is denied without prejudice with leave to refile after the case becomes at issue. Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/28/2024.(dgumb, ) Modified on 8/29/2024 to edit text (dgumb, ).
August 28, 2024 Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #15 Minute Order. Mailed to Arthur Walker #61612 Bent County Correctional Facility (BCCF) 11560 Road FF75 Las Animas, CO 81054-9573 (dgumb, )
August 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MINUTE ORDER: The above-captioned case has been directly assigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1. Magistrate Consent Form due 10/15/2024. Preliminary Scheduling/Status Conference set for 10/21/2024 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Plaintiff shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Preliminary Scheduling/Status Conference. Plaintiff shall participate in this Conference by telephone. Plaintiff and his case manager, or a representative of the facility shall appear by telephone by calling the following conference line at the appointed time: Number: 888-278-0296. Access code: 8212991#. Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/28/2024. (dgumb, )
August 28, 2024 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of Mailing re #13 Certificate of Service. Mailed to Arthur Walker #61612 Bent County Correctional Facility (BCCF) 11560 Road FF75 Las Animas, CO 81054-9573 (dgumb, )
August 28, 2024 Filing 13 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re #1 Prisoner Complaint for Service of Process. (dgumb, )
August 28, 2024 Filing 12 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (sphil, )
August 28, 2024 Filing 11 CASE REASSIGNED. Pursuant to #10 Order on Report and Recommendations, this case is directly reassigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty for all further proceedings All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-02150-MEH. (Text Only Entry) (sphil, )
August 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER DRAWING CASE by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/28/2024. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 7) is accepted and adopted. Claim One in the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 1) asserted against Defendant Foreman in her official capacity for prospective injunctive relief is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. Claim One in the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. 1) asserted against Defendant Foreman in her individual capacity for damages is assigned to Chief Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR. 40.1(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). (sphil, )
August 26, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiff Arthur Walker. (sphil, )
August 15, 2024 Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Arthur Walker. All parties consent. (dgumb, )
August 6, 2024 Filing 7 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Complaint filed by Arthur Walker, by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 8/6/2024. Objections to R&R due by 8/20/2024 (sphil, )
August 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF REFERENCE to the United States Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 8/6/2024. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1,United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action. All future pleadings should be designated as 24-cv-02150-LTB-RTG. (sphil, )
August 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 8/5/2024. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign thismatter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (sphil, )
August 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Granting #3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to ProceedPursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to [email protected] by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 8/5/2024. (email sent to CDOC)(sphil, )
August 2, 2024 Filing 3 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915, by Plaintiff Arthur Walker. (ykare, )
August 2, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley. Text Only Entry (ykare, )
August 2, 2024 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Foreman, filed by Arthur Walker.(ykare, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Walker v. Foreman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Foreman
Represented By: Kristin K. Lindemann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?