Stanton v. Sauceda et al
| Allison Stanton |
| Mindy Vasquez, Elizabeth Beebe Volz, Michael R. Westerberg, Nancy Sauceda, Randall M. Chin, Guardian Title Agency and Rocket Mortgage |
| 1:2024cv02280 |
| August 19, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Kathryn A Starnella |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 42 PLAINTIFF'S PETITION IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S #40 MOTION TO DISMISS #40 for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Plaintiff Allison Stanton. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 41 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION , Notice of Related Cases by Dmitry B. Vilner on behalf of Elizabeth Beebe Volz (Vilner, Dmitry) |
| Filing 40 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim , MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction by Defendant Elizabeth Beebe Volz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 22-cv-2162 Order Adopting Recommendation, #2 Exhibit B - 24CV31195 Motion for Foreclosure, #3 Exhibit C - 24CV31195 Order Authorizing Sale, #4 Exhibit D - 24CV31195 Notice of Appeal, #5 Exhibit E - 24CA1343 Register of Actions, #6 Exhibit F - 24CA1343 Stanton Opening Brief, #7 Exhibit G - 2023CV110 Order Granting Motion to Dismiss and Barring Plaintiff from Further Filings Without Legal Representation)(Vilner, Dmitry) |
| Filing 39 MEMORANDUM regarding #38 Second MOTION for More Definite Statement. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/09/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc7, ) |
| Filing 38 Second MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendant Nancy Sauceda. (Wasilik, Bernadette) |
| Filing 37 MEMORANDUM regarding #36 Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Motion for Default filed by Nancy Sauceda. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/07/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc7, ) |
| Filing 36 MOTION for Discovery , Supplemental MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Motion for Default by Defendant Nancy Sauceda. (Wasilik, Bernadette) |
| Filing 35 RESPONSE to #20 MOTION for Entry of Default as to filed by Defendant Nancy Sauceda. (Wasilik, Bernadette) |
| Filing 34 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by USPS by Clerk of Court re 33 Memorandum, to Allison Stanton at 16622 East Asbury Avenue Aurora, CO 80013. Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 33 MEMORANDUM regarding #32 Second MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Mindy Vasquez, Guardian Title Agency. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/04/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc2, ) |
| Filing 32 Second MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendants Guardian Title Agency, Mindy Vasquez. (Walker, David) |
| Filing 31 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Bernadette Jane Wasilik on behalf of Nancy SaucedaAttorney Bernadette Jane Wasilik added to party Nancy Sauceda(pty:dft) (Wasilik, Bernadette) |
| Filing 30 RESPONSE to #20 MOTION for Entry of Default as to filed by Defendant Michael R. Westerberg. (Swartzendruber, Benjamin) |
Filing 29
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court upon the filing of the #24 Amended Complaint. "It is well established that an amended complaint ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect." Davis v. TXO Prod. Corp., 929 F.2d 1515, 1517 (10th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, any motion directed at a superseded pleading is moot. See Brumfiel v. U.S. Bank, No. 12-cv-02716-WJM, 2013 WL 12246738, at *1 (D. Colo. May 16, 2013). For this reason, the pending #9 Motion for More Definite Statement, #14 Motion to Quash, and #19 Motion to Dismiss are hereby DENIED as moot. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 09/26/2024. Text Only Entry(nywlc7, )
|
| Filing 28 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Writer Mott on behalf of Michael R. WesterbergAttorney Writer Mott added to party Michael R. Westerberg(pty:dft) (Mott, Writer) |
| Filing 27 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service for Defendants Sauceda, Westerberg, Volz, Walker, and Chin, filed by Plaintiff Allison Stanton (norlin, ) |
| Filing 26 NOTICE re #14 MOTION to Quash Service of Process by Defendant Elizabeth Beebe Volz (Vilner, Dmitry) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Benjamin Paul Swartzendruber on behalf of Michael R. WesterbergAttorney Benjamin Paul Swartzendruber added to party Michael R. Westerberg(pty:dft) (Swartzendruber, Benjamin) |
| Filing 24 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Nancy Sauceda, Mindy Vasquez, Elizabeth Beebe Volz, Michael R. Westerberg, Guardian Title Agency, Rocket Mortgage, filed by Allison Stanton.(norlin, ) |
| Filing 23 MEMORANDUM regarding #19 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Nancy Sauceda. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 09/17/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc7, ) |
| Filing 22 REPLY to Response to #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Defendant Mindy Vasquez. (Walker, David) |
| Filing 21 CLERK'S NOTE REGARDING DEFAULT Default will not be entered as to Nancy Sauceda as: a responsive pleading has been filed, by Clerk. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 20 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b) by Plaintiff Allison Stanton. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 19 Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss by Defendant Nancy Sauceda. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 18 REPLY to Response to #14 MOTION to Quash Service of Process filed by Defendant Elizabeth Beebe Volz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Email from A. Stanton, #2 Exhibit B - Attachment to Email)(Vilner, Dmitry) |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement filed by Plaintiff Allison Stanton. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 16 RESPONSE to #14 MOTION to Quash Service of Process filed by Plaintiff Allison Stanton. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 15 MEMORANDUM regarding #14 MOTION to Quash Service of Process filed by Elizabeth Beebe Volz. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 09/09/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc7). |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Quash Service of Process by Defendant Elizabeth Beebe Volz. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A. Stanton documents served)(Vilner, Dmitry) |
| Filing 13 USPS Tracking Receipts re: #1 COMPLAINT for Defendant Chin, filed by Plaintiff Allison Stanton (norlin, ) |
| Filing 12 USPS Tracking Receipts re: #1 COMPLAINT for Defendants Volz, Westerberg, Sauceda, and Vasquez, filed by Plaintiff Allison Stanton (norlin, ) |
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #9 MOTION for More Definite Statement. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 09/06/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc7). |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Anywhere Integrated Services LLC for Mindy Vasquez. (Walker, David) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for More Definite Statement by Defendant Mindy Vasquez. (Walker, David) |
| Filing 8 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Allison Stanton- Plaintiff Party Does Consent. (efoga, ) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Allison Stanton. Nancy Sauceda served on 8/20/2024, answer due 9/10/2024; Mindy Vasquez served on 8/20/2024, answer due 9/10/2024. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Douglas Wayne Brown on behalf of Mindy VasquezAttorney Douglas Wayne Brown added to party Mindy Vasquez(pty:dft) (Brown, Douglas) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by David Cameron Walker on behalf of Mindy VasquezAttorney David Cameron Walker added to party Mindy Vasquez(pty:dft) (Walker, David) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 08/26/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc7, )
|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. Originals provided in person. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (agarc, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Randall M. Chin, Nancy Sauceda, Mindy Vasquez, Elizabeth Beebe Volz, and Michael R. Westerberg (Filing Fee: 450.00 Receipt Number:11547), filed by Allison Stanton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(agarc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
