Vectors, Inc. v LWS Leasing Inc.
Plaintiff: VECTORS, INC.
Defendant: LWS Leasing Inc. doing business as L.W. Survey Co. doing business as L.W. Survey/Leasing
Case Number: 1:2024cv02285
Filed: August 19, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
Referring Judge: Kathryn A Starnella
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 1, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE re #11 Answer to Complaint of Amended Answer and Counterclaims by Defendant LWS Leasing Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Amended Answer and Counterclaims - redline, #2 Exhibit A - spreadsheet showing the overcharging from 08/01/2018 to 11/01/2022, #3 Exhibit B - offer of settlement dated 11/11/2022 email, #4 Exhibit 2 - Amended Answer and Counterclaims - clean)(Tanner, John)
September 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 20 September 2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/11/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 12/18/2024 10:30 AM in Courtroom C204 before Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Continuation of Main Document) (cmadr, )
August 26, 2024 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Tanner, John)
August 26, 2024 Filing 11 ANSWER to #3 Complaint by LWS Leasing Inc..(Tanner, John)
August 23, 2024 Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Gelman, Scott)
August 22, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Scott N. Gelman on behalf of Vectors, Inc.Attorney Scott N. Gelman added to party Vectors, Inc.(pty:pla) (Gelman, Scott)
August 20, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 8/20/2024. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
August 20, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Notice of Removal as Filed in State Court by Defendant LWS Leasing Inc. (Tanner, John)
August 20, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by John Markham Tanner on behalf of All Defendants (Tanner, John)
August 19, 2024 Filing 5 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (efoga, )
August 19, 2024 Filing 4 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (efoga, )
August 19, 2024 Filing 3 COMPLAINT against LWS Leasing Inc., filed by Vectors, Inc..(efoga, )
August 19, 2024 Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (efoga, )
August 19, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by LWS LEASING INC. from Arapahoe County District Court, Case Number 2024CV031639. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-9830367), filed by LWS LEASING INC.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet JS 44 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal - State Court Summons, Civil Case Cover Sheet, and Complaint on LWS, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal - Affidavit of Lesley Welch, #4 Exhibit Exhibit C to Notice of Removal - Copy of State Court Docket and Delay Reduction Orders)(Tanner, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vectors, Inc. v LWS Leasing Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: VECTORS, INC.
Represented By: Scott N. Gelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LWS Leasing Inc. doing business as L.W. Survey Co. doing business as L.W. Survey/Leasing
Represented By: John Markham Tanner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?