Ray (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
Defendant: State of Colorado and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Petitioner: Austin Ray
Case Number: 1:2024cv02415
Filed: August 30, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Richard T Gurley
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2024 Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order of Dismissal. (jrobe, )
October 15, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 10/15/2024. It is ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Applicant failed to cure deficiencies. It is FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue because Plaintiff has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. (jrobe, )
September 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley on 09/04/2024. It is ORDERED that Petitioner cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty(30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Petitioner files in response to thisorder must include the civil action number provided at the top of this order. It isFURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the court shall mail to Petitioner copies ofthe court-approved form for filing an Application for Leave to Proceed in DistrictCourt Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form). Petitioner shall use the form incuring the filing deficiencies. It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner fails to cure all designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. (jrobe, )
August 30, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard Thomas Gurley. Text Only Entry (efoga, )
August 30, 2024 Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Austin Ray. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit)(efoga, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ray (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Austin Ray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Colorado
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?