Patent Armory Inc. v. Time2Market Cloud Services LLC
| Patent Armory Inc. |
| Time2Market Cloud Services LLC |
| 1:2024cv02452 |
| September 6, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| N Reid Neureiter |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Civil Case Terminated without Court order pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) on 10/29/2024. Text Only Entry (norlin, ) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal of Case by Plaintiff Patent Armory Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs Complaint (ECF No. #12 ) is GRANTED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint on or before November 1, 2024. PLEASE READ ATTACHED MINUTE ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 10/1/2024.(norlin, )
|
| Filing 12 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint,, by Defendant Time2Market Cloud Services LLC. (Juarez, Carolyn) |
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING/PLANNING CONFERENCE AND SETTINGDEADLINE FOR FILING OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FORM IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall promptly serve Defendant. On or before November 21, 2024, the parties shall complete and file the Consent/Non-Consent Form (see Dkt. #8 ), indicating either unanimous consent of the parties or that consent has been declined. Please note that this date may be earlier than the default deadlines contemplated by D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(c)(4). A Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.16(b) shall be held on: December 5, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom A-401, Fourth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. The Scheduling Conference will be conducted via telephone. Five minutes prior to the start of the hearing, the parties are directed to call the conference line as a participant at (571) 353-2301, Access Code 841686937#. If this date is not convenient for any counsel/pro se party, he/she should confer with opposing counsel/pro se party and file a motion to reschedule the conference to a more convenient date. Absent exceptional circumstances, no request for rescheduling any appearance in this court will be entertained unless a motion is filed no less than FIVE (5) business days in advance of the date of appearance. PLEASE READ ATTACHED ORDER. Entered by Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter on 9/6/2024. (norlin, )
|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (echa, ) |
| Filing 9 Report re Patent/Trademark: Report on the filing of an action emailed (NEF) to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (echa, ) |
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (echa, ) |
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge N. Reid Neureiter. Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to Time2Market Cloud Services LLC by Plaintiff Patent Armory Inc.. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark by Plaintiff Patent Armory Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 4 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 Administrative Notice: Notice to filer of non-compliance with Patent, Trademark, or Copyright Action case opening procedures. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party commencing the action to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.1. Please file a properly completed Report form, which can be found on the courts website. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Patent Armory Inc. by Isaac Philip Rabicoff on behalf of Patent Armory Inc. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against Time2Market Cloud Services LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-9859007)Attorney Isaac Philip Rabicoff added to party Patent Armory Inc.(pty:pla), filed by Patent Armory Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Patent No. 10,237,420, #2 Exhibit 2 - Patent No. 10,491,748, #3 Exhibit 3 - Patent No. 7,023,979, #4 Exhibit 4 - Patent No. 7,269,253, #5 Exhibit 5 - Patent No. 9,456,086, #6 Exhibit 6- Claim Chart - US10,237,420, #7 Exhibit 7- Claim Chart - US10,491,748, #8 Exhibit 8- Claim Chart - US7,023,979, #9 Exhibit 9 - Claim Chart - US7,269,253, #10 Exhibit 10 - Claim Chart - US9,456,086, #11 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Patent Armory Inc. v. Time2Market Cloud Services LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patent Armory Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Philip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Time2Market Cloud Services LLC | |
| Represented By: | Carolyn Valerie Juarez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.