Solazzo (PS) v. Polis et al
| Andrew Solazzo |
| Colorado State Board of Parole and Jared Polis |
| 1:2024cv02603 |
| September 20, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number 112270. (echa, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 09/25/2024. ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must pay the full $5.00 filing fee within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. FURTHER ORDERED that, if Petitioner fails to pay the $5.00 filing fee within the time allowed, the habeas corpus application may be denied, and the action will be dismissed without further notice. (pklin, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley. Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 2 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Petitioner Andrew Solazzo. (agryan) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Colorado State Board of Parole. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(agryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.