Intlekofer et al v. Hicks
Plaintiff: Michael Rea, Richard Ertle and Robert J. Intlekofer
Defendant: Joe Hicks and Michael J. Bohn, Jr.
Case Number: 1:2024cv02708
Filed: September 30, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Daniel D Domenico
Referring Judge: Scott T Varholak
Nature of Suit: Commerce ICC Rates, Etc.
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court sua sponte. The Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2024 at 11:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak is CONVERTED to a Status Conference at the same date and time, and the deadline to submit a joint proposed scheduling order is VACATED. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 11/27/2024. Text Only Entry (stvlc5, )
October 31, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #10 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Quash filed by Michael J. Bohn, Jr. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 10/31/2024. Text Only Entry (dddlc9, )
October 30, 2024 Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Quash Service of Process by Defendant Michael J. Bohn, Jr. (cmadr, )
October 25, 2024 Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance to Provide Limited Representation by Joseph A. Murr on behalf of Joe HicksAttorney Joseph A. Murr added to party Joe Hicks(pty:dft) (Murr, Joseph)
October 15, 2024 Filing 8 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service of Summons and Complaint upon Joe Hicks/H2 Properties on 10/9/2024 (cmadr, )
October 11, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed Joe Hicks served on 10/9/2024, answer due 10/30/2024. (cmadr, )
October 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 10/2/2024. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/26/2024. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2024 11:45 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. (sphil, )
September 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 9/30/2024. Text Only Entry. (rkeec)
September 30, 2024 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (agryan)
September 30, 2024 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Daniel D. Domenico and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry. (agryan)
September 30, 2024 Filing 2 SUMMONS issued by Clerk over the counter. (agryan)
September 30, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joe Hicks (Filing Fee: 405.00 Receipt Number:111984), filed by Robert J. Intlekofer, Richard Ertle, Michael Rea. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Receipt)(agryan) Modified on 9/30/2024 to replace unopenable file (agryan).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Intlekofer et al v. Hicks
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Hicks
Represented By: Joseph A. Murr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Bohn, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Rea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Richard Ertle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert J. Intlekofer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?