Berry v. Westfield Insurance Company
| Michael Berry |
| Westfield Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv02783 |
| October 8, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Maritza Dominguez Braswell |
| Regina M Rodriguez |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant Westfield Insurance Company. (Bradley, Rachel) |
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent Ohio Farmers Insurance Company for Westfield Insurance Company. (McLetchie, Andrew) |
| Filing 11 Defendant's ANSWER to #4 Complaint Attorney Rachel Lisotta Bradley added to party Westfield Insurance Company(pty:dft) by Westfield Insurance Company.(Bradley, Rachel) |
| Filing 10 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #8 Notice of Entry of Appearance filed by attorney Jaime Christiaan Phillips. Attorney or pro se has used an incorrect signature format in violation of D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(a) and 4.3(a) of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases). DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. In the future, the filer must affix an electronic s/signature and s/followed by a typed, not an inked, address signature to all future documents.(Text Only Entry) (dgumb, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 12/4/2024. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 10/10/2024. (evaug )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jaime Christiaan Phillips on behalf of All Plaintiffs Attorney Jaime Christiaan Phillips added to party Michael Berry(pty:pla) (Phillips, Jaime) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 10/9/2024. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
|
| Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (echa, ) |
| Filing 5 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 4 CIVIL COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGE against Westfield Insurance Company, filed by Michael Berry.(echa, ) |
| Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Westfield Insurance Company from District Court, El Paso County, Colorado, Case Number 2024CV31829. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-9920089), filed by Westfield Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(McLetchie, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Berry v. Westfield Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Michael Berry | |
| Represented By: | Jaime Christiaan Phillips |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Westfield Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Andrew R. McLetchie |
| Represented By: | Rachel Lisotta Bradley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
