Stead (PS) v. Stucker et al
| Timothy R. Stead |
| Stucker and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The |
| 1:2024cv02860 |
| October 15, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Petitioner to File an Amended Habeas Application. If Petitioner fails to file an Amended Habeas Application within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/12/2024. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Granting #2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to ProceedPursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 10/17/2024.(sphil, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action by Petitioner Timothy R. Stead. (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Timothy R. Stead. (Attachments: #1 Duplicate Copy)(efoga, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
