Jones (PS) v. USA - Federal Bureau of Prison
| Prince Jones |
| USA - Federal Bureau of Prison |
| 1:2024cv03281 |
| November 25, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Prisoner - Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 01/14/2025. Plaintiff's "Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint" [ECF No. #6 ] requesting a 60-day extension of time to file an amended Prisoner Complaint is GRANTED IN PART as follows. Plaintiff is GRANTED a 30-day extension from the date of this order to file an amended Prisoner Complaint, making the new deadline February 13, 2025. If Plaintiff does not file an amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with the Court's order to amend [ECF No. #5 ] within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without further notice.(ggill, )
|
| Filing 6 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME to file Amended Complaint. by Plaintiff Prince Jones. (amona,) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO FILE AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/04/2024. Plaintiff shall file, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, an amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with all directives contained in thisorder. To be clear, Plaintiff must submit a single, fully completed Prisoner Complaint on the current court-approved form as one document that contains all claims andallegations. Plaintiff is advised that the Court is not required to sort through multiple pleadings to ascertain his claims or compile the required information from multiple documents. Plaintiff shall obtain and utilize the current court approved Prisoner Complaint form (with the assistance of a case manager or the facility's legal assistant), along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended Prisoner Complaint that complies with this order within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice. (ggill, )
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915 By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/26/2024. The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to ProceedPursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. That within thirty days of the date of this order Plaintiff's custodian shall disburse from Plaintiff's prison account an initial partial filing fee of $29.00 to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado, which represents 20 percent of the greater of the (1) average monthly deposits, or (2) averagemonthly balance in Plaintiff's prison account for the six-month period immediatelypreceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b). That after payment of the initial partial filing fee Plaintiff's custodian shall disburse from Plaintiff's prison account monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month's income credited to his prison account until Plaintiff has paidthe total filing fee of $350.00. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2). Interference by Plaintiff in the submission of these funds will result in the dismissal of this action. Plaintiff is advised that notwithstanding any filing fee,or any portion thereof that may have been paid, the Court shall dismiss at any time all or any part of such complaint which (1) is frivolous or malicious; (2) fails to state a claim on which relief can be granted; or (3) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b); 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff's custodian shall continue to disburse monthly payments from Plaintiff's prison account until full payment of the filing fee has been paid to the Court, even after disposition of the case and regardless of whether relief is granted or denied. The Clerk of Court shall not issue process at this time. The United States Marshals Service shall serve process on any remaining defendant(s) for whom personal service is required if the case is later drawn to a district judge or a magistrate judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). The Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order to #[email protected].(ggill, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley. Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Prince Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(echa, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against USA - Federal Bureau of Prison, filed by Prince Jones. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(echa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jones (PS) v. USA - Federal Bureau of Prison | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA - Federal Bureau of Prison | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Prince Jones | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.