Thiry et al v. Gehlen et al
| Thiry O'Leary Foundation, Denise O'Leary and Kent Thiry |
| David Mucha and Robert P Gehlen |
| 1:2024cv03313 |
| November 27, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Other Fraud |
| 7 U.S.C. ยง 25 Fraud - Commodities Leverage Contracts |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 01/02/2025. Consent form due March 20, 2025. Proposed scheduling order (including a copy in Word format to # [email protected]) due March 27, 2025. The Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference shall be held telephonically on April 3, 2025, at 9:30 a.m., in Courtroom A-502, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. The parties shall attend by calling 571-353-2301, Guest meeting ID- 868150043. All attendees shall please mute their phone when not speaking and not use speaker phone. (sjeff)
|
|
Filing 7
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kent Thiry, Thiry O'Leary Foundation, Denise O'Leary. David Mucha waiver sent on 12/31/2024, answer due 3/3/2025. (Donaho, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 6
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kent Thiry, Thiry O'Leary Foundation, Denise O'Leary. Robert P Gehlen waiver sent on 12/31/2024, answer due 3/3/2025. (Donaho, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found#here. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 12/2/24. Text Only Entry (jdyne) Modified on 12/5/2024 (cnsja, ).
|
|
Filing 4
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Donaho, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 3
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (efoga, )
|
|
Filing 2
Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry (efoga, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Robert P Gehlen, David Mucha (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10008211)Attorney Thomas A. Donaho added to party Kent Thiry(pty:pla), Attorney Thomas A. Donaho added to party Denise O'Leary(pty:pla), Attorney Thomas A. Donaho added to party Thiry O'Leary Foundation(pty:pla), filed by Kent Thiry, Thiry O'Leary Foundation, Denise O'Leary. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Review, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Robert P Gehlen, #4 Summons David Mucha)(Donaho, Thomas)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
