Gay et al v. Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff: Philip T. Gay and Jean M. Gay
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 1:2024cv03437
Filed: December 11, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Susan Prose
Referring Judge: Regina M Rodriguez
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Taxes
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2024 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (sadhi, )
December 11, 2024 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by USPS by Clerk of Court re 4 Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge,,,, to Jean M. Gay and Philip T. Gay at 9295 Twenty Mile Road Unit #109 Parker, CO 80134-6295. Text Only Entry. (echa, )
December 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan B. Prose. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. SO ORDERED by Judge Regina M. Rodriguez on 12/11/2024. Text Only Entry (rmrja)
December 11, 2024 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (sadhi, )
December 11, 2024 Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Regina M. Rodriguez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (sadhi, )
December 11, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Internal Revenue Service (Filing Fee: $405 Receipt Number: 112726), filed by Jean M. Gay, Philip T. Gay.(sadhi, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/11/2024: #1 Waiver of Service, #2 Receipt) (sadhi, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gay et al v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philip T. Gay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jean M. Gay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?