Slack (PS) v. Hall et al
| Freddy Slack |
| Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The, Jr. Hall, Davis Talley, Randi Moore, Daric Harvey and Stephen Holmes |
| 1:2024cv03572 |
| December 26, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Letter by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (amona, ) |
Filing 5
ORDER Directing Mr. Slack to File Amended Application. It is ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, Petitioner must file an amended Application that complies with this order. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 1/27/2025. (amona,)
|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. It is ORDERED that the Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/31/2024.(tlove, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley. Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 in a Habeas Corpus Action. by Petitioner Freddy Slack. (agryan) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2254, filed by Freddy Slack. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(agryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.