Reuter (PS) v. Brethouwer et al
| Dianna Grace Reuter |
| Catherine Brethouwer, Kristy Drye, Paul Leroy Goats, Tania Hajjar, Susan Kelley, Martha Lenihan, Patrick Lenihan, Liberty Mutual Insurance, City of Montrose, Carolyn Packard, Gregory Packard, Phelps Real Estate Group, Inc., Norris-Phillips Real Estate, LLC, Sharon Sawyer, Mariah Strong, Christopher Tarman, Marie Teal and Nancy White |
| 1:2025cv00310 |
| January 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 MOTION for Relief from Judgment by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #13 ORDER OF DISMISSAL on 3/4/2025. (sphil, ) |
Filing 13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 3/4/2025. The Complaint (ECF No. 1) and the action are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous. ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 8) is accepted and adopted. IFP on appeal is DENIED without prejudice.(sphil, )
|
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 2/19/2025. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 9) is DENIED as incoherent. Plaintiff's "Letter of Request for a More Definite Statement" (ECF No. 10) is DENIED as incoherent. Plaintiff's "Motion for Reconsideration" (ECF No. 11) is DENIED as incoherent. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Reconsideration by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for a More Definite Statement by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Dianna Grace Reuter. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 8 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE re #1 Complaint, filed by Dianna Grace Reuter, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 2/10/2025. Objections to R&R due by 2/24/2025 (sphil, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER OF REFERENCE to the United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 2/7/2025. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-00310-LTB-RTG. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 6
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 2/4/2025. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 5 STATEMENT filed by Dianna Grace Reuter.(sphil, ) Modified on 2/4/2025 to edit title per chambers. (sphil, ). |
| Filing 4 FILING FEE RECEIVED: $ 405.00, receipt number 113181. (echa, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 1/29/2025. (sphil, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley. Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Catherine Brethouwer, Carolyn Packard, City of Montrose, Kristy Drye, Paul Leroy Goats, Tania Hajjar, Susan Kelley, Martha Lenihan, Patrick Lenihan, Liberty Mutual Insurance, Norris-Phillips Real Estate, LLC, Gregory Packard, Phelps Real Estate Group, Inc., Sharon Sawyer, Mariah Strong, Christopher Tarman, Marie Teal, Nancy White, filed by Dianna Grace Reuter. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment)(agryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
