Sorensen-Bain et al v. Vereo Group Inc.
| Sumer Sorensen-Bain and Shane Barber |
| Vereo Group Inc. |
| Vereo Group Inc. |
| Shane Barber and Sumer Sorensen-Bain |
| 1:2025cv00400 |
| February 6, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Cyrus Y Chung |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION to Transfer Case Venue by Counter Claimant Vereo Group Inc., Defendant Vereo Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A -Business Sale & Purchase Agreement, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B- Employment Agreement for Sumer Sorensen-Bain, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C- Employment Agreement for Shane Barber, #4 Exhibit Exhibit D-Performance Bonus Plan for Sumer Sorensen-Bain, #5 Exhibit Exhibit E- Performance Bonus Plan for Shane Barber)(Cooper, Keslie) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Filing Amended Pleading by Counter Claimant Vereo Group Inc., Defendant Vereo Group Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, First Amended Answer and Counterclaims)(Cooper, Keslie) |
Filing 14
MINUTE ORDER: This matter is before the Court on email correspondence from the parties. Magistrate Consent Form due 4/10/2025. Proposed Scheduling Order due 4/10/2025. Scheduling Conference reset for 4/17/2025 11:30 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 3/5/2025. (dgumb, )
|
| Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time to Answer or Respond to the Complaint Counterclaims by Counter Defendants Shane Barber, Sumer Sorensen-Bain, Plaintiffs Sumer Sorensen-Bain, Shane Barber. Shane Barber answer due 3/27/2025; Sumer Sorensen-Bain answer due 3/27/2025. (Duvall, Jody) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jody Nicholas Duvall on behalf of Sumer Sorensen-Bain, Shane BarberAttorney Jody Nicholas Duvall added to party Sumer Sorensen-Bain(pty:pla), Attorney Jody Nicholas Duvall added to party Shane Barber(pty:cd), Attorney Jody Nicholas Duvall added to party Sumer Sorensen-Bain(pty:cd), Attorney Jody Nicholas Duvall added to party Shane Barber(pty:pla) (Duvall, Jody) |
| Filing 11 Summons Returned Unexecuted by All Defendants as to All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Swan, Andrew) |
| Filing 10 Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff's ANSWER to #6 Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM Verified against All Plaintiffs by Vereo Group Inc..(Swan, Andrew) |
|
Filing 9
MINUTE ORDER: The above captioned case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung pursuant to D.C.Colo.LCivR 40.1. Magistrate Consent Form due 3/25/2025. Proposed Scheduling Order due 3/25/2025. Scheduling Conference set for 4/1/2025 10:30 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 2/6/2025. (dgumb, )
|
| Filing 8 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (efoga, ) |
| Filing 7 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry (efoga, ) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Vereo Group Inc., filed by Sumer Sorensen-Bain, Shane Barber.(efoga, ) |
| Filing 5 FIRST AND FINAL NOTICE TO ALL ATTORNEY(S) AND UNREPRESENTED PARTIES IN REMOVED, TRANSFERRED, OR OTHER CASES. To receive any further notice in a case removed or transferred to this court, or special matters including discovery disputes, bankruptcy appeals, or withdrawals of reference, Multi-district litigation (MDL), etc., all attorneys and unrepresented parties must enter an appearance under D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(a). An attorney must be an active member of this court's bar and be in good standing in accordance with D.C.COLO.LAttyR 3. A waiver of the fee for bar admission may apply in limited situations. (Text Only Entry) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 4 ADMINISTRATIVE REMINDER to Filer. It is the responsibility of the attorney or pro se party removing the case to follow Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1 and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a when filing a Notice of Removal. (Text only entry.) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 3 ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE to filer of non-compliance with Notice of Removal case opening procedures. Pursuant to Local Rule D.C.COLO.LCivR 81.1, and 28 U.S.C. Section 1446a, each of the state court documents shall be individual PDFs. See Appendix B Notice of Removal in the User Guide - Attorney Case Opening Procedures document. (Text Only Entry.) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 2 ADVISORY NOTICE OF NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT RULES/PROCEDURES: re: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by attorney Andrew E Swan. DO NOT REFILE THE DOCUMENT. Action to take - counsel must submit a change of contact request through the Manage my Account tab at the PACER website at https://www.pacer.gov/, pursuant to D.C.COLO.LAttyR 5(c) and 3.5 of the Electronic Case Filing Procedures (Civil cases).(Text Only Entry) (efoga, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Vereo Group Inc. from Denver District Court, Case Number 2025CV30054. (Filing fee $ 405, Receipt Number ACODC-10135716), filed by Vereo Group Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A_Denver District Court file, #2 Exhibit Exhibit Defendant's Notice of Filing of Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Case Cover Sheet)(Swan, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
