Hayner (PS) v. United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7
| Thomas Hayner |
| United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 |
| 1:2025cv00487 |
| February 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 American With Disabilities Act (ADA) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 27 March 2025. RECOMMENDED that the amended Complaint (ECF No. #5 ) and the action be dismissed as legally frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). (cmadr, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 26 March 2025. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 8
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 25 March 2025. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 20 March 2025. ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #6 ) is granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Short Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is denied as moot.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 6 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Thomas Hayner. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7, filed by Thomas Hayner.(cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 18 February 2025. ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. (Mailed as Ordered) (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley. Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Thomas Hayner. (agryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7, filed by Thomas Hayner. (Attachments: #1 USM-285)(agryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hayner (PS) v. United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thomas Hayner | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) Local 7 | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
