Chin v. Palmer et al
| Keith Chin |
| Thomas R. Palmer, Karyn F. Ovelmen, Natascha Viljoen, Gregory H. Boyce, Bruce R. Brook, Jane Nelson, Julio M. Quintana, Rene Medori, Maura J. Clark, Susan N. Story, Jose Manuel Madero, Emma Fitzgerald, Philip Aiken, Sally-Anne Layman and Newmont Corporation |
| 1:2025cv00910 |
| March 20, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Kathryn A Starnella |
| Stockholders Suits |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE: Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 3.2 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1(a), and with the approval of the Chief Judge, it is ORDERED that this case and each member case (25-cv-660, 25-cv-910, and 25-cv-1071), shall be reassigned to the Honorable Daniel D. Domenico and Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. All future filings in this case shall be designated as 25-cv-00585-DDD-KAS. SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/2/2025. Text Only Entry (skcja, ) (Text Only Entry) (ggill, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting 21 Unopposed Motion to Consolidate Related Shareholder Derivative Actions (Motion). The Motion seeks to consolidate Chin v. Palmer, et al., No. 1:25-cv-00910-PAB, and Harris v. Palmer, et al., No. 1:25-cv-01071-PAB, into lead case Gunderson v. Palmer, et al., No. 1:25-cv-00585-SKC-STV. The plaintiffs in each case are in agreement regarding consolidation, and the defendants in each do not oppose consolidation. Because these cases involve common questions of law and fact, the Court GRANTS the Motion.In accordance with the Court's inherent power to control its docket, and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 42(a), Civil Action Nos. 1:25-cv-00910-PAB and 1:25-cv-01071-PAB are CONSOLIDATED into the above-captioned action. Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00585-SKC-STV shall be the lead case, and all future filings shall be made in this action only. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.Civ.R 40.1(d)(4)(C), the Clerk is directed to reassign Civil Action Nos. 1:25-cv-00910-PAB and 1:25-cv-01071-PAB to the undersigned as the Presiding Judge.SO ORDERED by Judge S. Kato Crews on 5/1/2025. Text Only Entry (skclc3) (ggill, )
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE RELATED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE ACTIONS by Plaintiff Keith Chin (Seely, Kevin) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued by Clerk re #4 . (tlove, ) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS REQUEST re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Keith Chin. (Robbins, Brian) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). The summons submitted has incomplete caption and not issued. Please file completed summons for issuance using the event "Summons Request". (eluce, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry. (eluce, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Philip Aiken, Gregory H. Boyce, Bruce R. Brook, Maura J. Clark, Emma Fitzgerald, Sally-Anne Layman, Jose Manuel Madero, Rene Medori, Jane Nelson, Newmont Corporation, Karyn F. Ovelmen, Thomas R. Palmer, Julio M. Quintana, Susan N. Story, Natascha Viljoen (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10225680)Attorney Brian James Robbins added to party Keith Chin(pty:pla), filed by Keith Chin. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Robbins, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
