Hoid et al (PS) v. KNOP-2 News et al
| Edward Hoid |
| KNOP-2 News, Jason Malterud, Joshua Burke, Rachael Sloan-Stoggsdill, Jeff Satur, Zach Ardis, Stanley Jerido, Ryan Day, Nancy Salamone, Bruce Langer, Nicole Collins, Benjamin Collett, Ryan Dawson-Erdman, Fox-31 News, ABC-7 News, CBS-4 News, NBC-9 News, Jon High, Gray Media Group Inc, Denver Post, The, Longmont Times-Call, Denver Gazette, The, Americas Most Wanted, Ballard Spahr, Ashley Kissinger, Kennison Lay, Sherri Clark, Mark Bailey, Eric Elliff, Hawthorne, Fox, Lum, Google, Johnson, Lipinski and Moultrie |
| 1:2025cv01164 |
| April 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Christine M Arguello |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 42 RECORD ON APPEAL re: #39 Notice of Appeal. Volume I - Pleadings filed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. (USCA Case No. 25-1314). (sphil, ) |
| Filing 41 USCA Case Number 25-1314 for #39 Notice of Appeal filed by Edward Hoid. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 40 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #39 Notice of Appeal filed by Edward Hoid to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed,) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record)(sphil, ) |
| Filing 39 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #37 Order on Report and Recommendations,,, Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify,, #38 Clerk's Judgment by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. (sphil, ) |
| Filing 38 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #37 Order of Dismissal on 8/13/2025. (sphil, ) |
Filing 37
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Senior Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/13/2025. The second amended Complaint #26 and the action are DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8. The Motion to File Amended Complaint #33 is DENIED because Plaintiff's proposed third amended Complaint #34 does not comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IFP on appeal is DENIED without prejudice. (sphil, )
|
|
Filing 36
ORDER OF RECUSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 08/12/2025. It is ordered that The Motion for Case Reassignment and Recusal (ECF No. #29 ) is granted and I recuse myself from further service in this matter. Therefore, this case is reassigned to Judge Christine M. Arguello. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-1164-CMA-RTG. (agryan)
|
| Filing 35 MOTION to Object the Recommendation #30 filed by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. (agryan) |
| Filing 34 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against ABC-7 News, Americas Most Wanted, Zach Ardis, Mark Bailey, Joshua Burke, CBS-4 News, Sherri Clark, Benjamin Collett, Nicole Collins, Ryan Dawson-Erdman, Ryan Day, Denver Gazette, The, Denver Post, The, Eric Elliff, Fox, Fox-31 News, Google, Gray Media Group Inc, Hawthorne, Jon High, Stanley Jerido, Johnson, KNOP-2 News, Ashley Kissinger, Bruce Langer, Kennison Lay, Lipinski, Longmont Times-Call, Lum, Jason Malterud, Moultrie, NBC-9 News, Nancy Salamone, Jeff Satur, Rachael Sloan-Stoggsdill, Ballard Spahr, filed by Edward Hoid.(ggill, ) |
| Filing 33 MOTION to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. (ggill, ) |
| Filing 32 Motion to OBJECT the #30 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. (ggill, ) |
|
Filing 31
ORDER denying #25 MOTION to File Amended Complaint, pursuant to ECF #30 RECOMMENDATION by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 7/21/2025.(amona,)
|
|
Filing 30
RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE. ORDERED that the Motion to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. #25 ) is denied as moot. It is RECOMMENDED that the amended Complaint (ECF No. #26 ) and the action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to comply with the pleading requirements of Rule 8. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 7/21/2025. (amona,)
|
| Filing 29 MOTION for Case Reassignment and Recusal by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. (amona,) |
|
Filing 28
ORDER OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1, United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 7/21/2025. (All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-1164-LTB-RTG) (amona,)
|
|
Filing 27
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 7/18/2025. (amona,)
|
| Filing 26 AMENDED COMPLAINT against ABC-7 News, Americas Most Wanted, Zach Ardis, Mark Bailey, Joshua Burke, CBS-4 News, Sherri Clark, Benjamin Collett, Nicole Collins, Ryan Dawson-Erdman, Ryan Day, Denver Gazette, The, Denver Post, The, Eric Elliff, Terry Fox, Fox-31 News, Google, Gray Media Group Inc, Robert Hawthorne, Jon High, Stanley Jerido, Johnson, KNOP-2 News, Ashley Kissinger, Bruce Langer, Kennison Lay, Lipinski, Longmont Times-Call, Katherine Lume, Jason Malterud, Moultrie, NBC-9 News, Nancy Salamone, Jeff Satur, Rachael Sloan-Stoggsdill, Ballard Spahr, filed by Edward Hoid. (amona,) |
| Filing 25 MOTION to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. (amona,) |
| Filing 24 NOTICE of Intent to File and Timely Filing by Plaintiff Edward Hoid (amona,) |
|
Filing 23
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to File Amended Complaint. Plaintiff shall file, within 30 days from the date of this Order, an amended complaint on the court-approved Complaint form. Plaintiff shall obtain the court-approved Complaint form, along with the applicable instructions, at www.cod.uscourts.gov. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/5/2025. (amona,)
|
| Filing 22 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Edward Hoid.(jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 06/02/2025. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint (ECF No. #19 ) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court file the tendered amended Complaint (ECF No. [19-1].) It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is GRANTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's "Notice of Supplemental Exhibits in Support of Equitable Estoppel and Appointment of Counsel" (ECF No. #6 ) and Motion to Compel Action (ECF No. #18 ) are DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the court review the amended Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). It is FURTHER ORDERED that process shall not issue at this time. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the United States Marshals Service shall serve process on any remaining Defendants for whom personal service is required if the case is later drawn to a district judge and/or a magistrate judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c).(jrobe, )
|
| Filing 20 Notice of Change of Circumstance by Plaintiffs Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid. (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 19 Motion to Amend Complaint re: #12 by Plaintiffs Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Amended Complaint)(dgumb, ) |
| Filing 18 MOTION to Compel Action by Plaintiffs Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid. (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #15 Notice (Other) Addressed to Edward Herbert Hoid and Edward Hoid. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (echa, ) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Change of Mailing Address by Plaintiff Edward Hoid (agryan) |
| Filing 15 Notice of Circumstantial Improvements and Developments by Plaintiffs Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 14 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File,,,,,,, Addressed to Edward Herbert Hoid. (efoga, ) |
| Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 Order, #12 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File,,,,,,, Addressed to Edward Hoid. (echa, ) |
|
Filing 12
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 5/1/2025. This matter is before the Court on the "Notice of Mail Delivery Failure and Motion for Extension of Time" (ECF No. #11 ) filed April 30, 2025, by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. The motion for extension of time (ECF No. #11 ) is GRANTED and Plaintiff Edward Hoid shall have up to and including May 30, 2025, to cure the deficiencies in this action as directed in the Court's Order to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #4 ). The "Notice of Mail Delivery Failure and Motion for Extension of Time" (ECF No. #5 ) filed April 17, 2025, is DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail to Plaintiff Edward Hoid, together with a copy of this Minute Order, a copy of the Order to Cure Deficiencies (ECF No. #4 ) entered in this action on April 14, 2025. [Documents mailed as ordered](dgumb, )
|
| Filing 11 Notice of Mail Delivery Failure and Motion for Extension of Time by Plaintiffs Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(dgumb, ) |
| Filing 10 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to Addressed to Edward Herbert Hoid. (sadhi, ) |
| Filing 9 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #6 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel Addressed to Edward Herbert Hoid. (agryan) |
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #5 MOTION for Extension of Time to, #6 MOTION to Appoint Pro Bono Counsel Addressed to Edward Hoid. (Attachments: #1 Continuation of Main Document) (agryan) |
| Filing 7 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #4 Order Addressed to Edward Hoid at 800 North Garfield Avenue Loveland, CO 80537 970-692-6916. (sadhi, ) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Supplemental Exhibits in Support of Equitable Estoppel and Appointment of Counsel by Plaintiffs Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid. (dgumb, ) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Mail Delivery Failure and Motion for Extension of Time by Plaintiffs Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(dgumb, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. Edward Hoid shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this order to file an amended complaint as directed, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/14/2025. (dgumb, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Edward Hoid. (agryan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ABC-7 News, Americas Most Wanted, David Archuleta, Zach Ardis, Mark Bailey, Joshua Burke, CBS-4 News, Sherri Clark, Benjamin Collett, Nicole Collins, Ryan Dawson-Erdman, Ryan Day, Denver Gazette, The, Denver Post, The, Eric Elliff, Fox, Fox-31 News, Gray Media Group Inc, Hawthorne, Jon High, Stanley Jerido, KNOP-2 News, Ashley Kissinger, Bruce Langer, Kennison Lay, Dea Lindsey, Longmont Times-Call, Lum, Jason Malterud, NBC-9 News, Nancy Salamone, Jeff Satur, Rachael Sloan-Stoggsdill, Ballard Spahr, filed by Edward Herbert Hoid(minor children), Edward Hoid, Edward Herbert Hoid(incorporated families; and on behalf of signatures of the public and witnesses). (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(agryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
