Hayes-Bey (PS) v. Molina et al
| Willie T. Hayes-Bey |
| Molina, Kirk Firko, Brown, Iglesias and Michael Condon |
| 1:2025cv01207 |
| April 16, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #10 Clerk's Judgment, 11 Reassigning Judge, #9 Order Reassigning Case,,, Order Dismissing Case,, Addressed to Willie T. Hayes-Bey #1438193 Arapahoe County Detention Facility P.O. Box 4918 Centennial, CO 80155-4918. (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 11 REASSIGNING JUDGE. Pursuant to ECF #9 , this action is reassigned to Judge Lewis T. Babcock. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-01207-LTB. (Text Only Entry) (cmadr, ) |
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #9 Order on 31 July 2025. (cmadr, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 31 July 2025. ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant toFed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to comply with a Court order, failure to prosecute, andfailure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 5.1(c). It isFURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal isDENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed informa pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. ItisFURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 8 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #7 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis,, Addressed to Willie T. Hayes-Bey. (echa, ) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 23 June 2025. Plaintiff will be given one final opportunity to cure the remaining filing deficiency in this action. To be clear, Plaintiff must file on or before July 24, 2025, a certified copy of his inmate account statement for the preceding six-month period. If he fails to do so, this action will be dismissed without further notice.Finally, the initial Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #2 ) is denied as moot.(cmadr, )
|
| Filing 6 PRISONER'S MOTION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 By Plaintiff Willie T. Hayes-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(ggill, ) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brown, Michael Condon, Kirk Firko, Iglesias, Molina, filed by Willie T. Hayes-Bey. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ggill, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure all designated deficiencies by the deadline the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/16/2025. (amona,)
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Willie T. Hayes-Bey. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Brown, Michael Condon, Kirk Firko, Iglesias, Molina, filed by Willie T. Hayes-Bey.(echa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
