Collins (PS) v. Telvison Network et al
| Dashay Kennyada Collins |
| Telvison Network and Dish Network |
| 1:2025cv01218 |
| April 17, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #4 Order Dismissing Case, on 5/28/2025. (ccuen, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to prosecute and cure the deficiency as directed. IFP on appeal is denied without prejudice, by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 5/28/2025. (ccuen, )
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4/18/2025. (ccuen, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (agryan) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Dish Network, Telvison Network, filed by Dashay Kennyada Collins.(agryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.