Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Barber
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Defendant: James Barber
Case Number: 1:2025cv01469
Filed: May 9, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Maritza Dominguez Braswell
Referring Judge: Charlotte N Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 15, 2025 Filing 26 Civil Case Terminated pursuant to [#25] Order to Dismiss case. Text Only Entry (sphil, )
September 15, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER granting #24 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice. Pursuant to the parties' stipulated motion, the Court orders that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Each party to pay his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/15/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(cnsja, )
September 15, 2025 Filing 24 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss with Prejudice by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Klann, Nicholas)
September 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 MINUTE ORDER re: #22 Notice of Settlement. Pursuant to the Notice of Settlement, the Court orders the parties to file a Dismissal Paper on or before 10/6/2025. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/5/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
September 5, 2025 Filing 22 NOTICE of Settlement by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company (Klann, Nicholas)
August 8, 2025 Filing 21 CERTIFICATE of Mailing by USPS by Clerk of Court re 18 Minute Order,, 19 Memorandum to James Barber at 3628 Citadell Drive North Colorado Springs, CO 80909. Text Only Entry. (eluce, )
August 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 20 MINUTE ORDER granting the #17 Joint Status Report and Unopposed Motion to Extend the Deadline to File the Proposed Scheduling Order. The deadline to file a proposed scheduling order is extended to September 5, 2025. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 8/8/2025. Text Only Entry(mdblc1)
August 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 19 MEMORANDUM regarding #17 Motion for Extension of Time to File the Proposed Scheduling Order. Motion #17 is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 8/8/2025. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
August 8, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER: Upon review of the filings in this case, the parties are ordered to review this Court's Uniform Civil Practice Standards. Specifically, CNS Civ. Practice Standard 10.1(a) which can be found #here. All future filings shall be made in Arial 12-point font. The Court may summarily strike future filings that do not comply. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 8/8/2025. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
August 7, 2025 Filing 17 MOTION for Extension of Time to File the Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Order Re: Status Report and Unopposed Motion to Extend the Deadline to File the Proposed Scheduling Order)(Klann, Nicholas)
July 15, 2025 Filing 16 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendant James Barber--Defendant Party Does Consent. (eguth, )
July 14, 2025 Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Defendant James Barber. (sphil, )
July 14, 2025 Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT/RETURN of Service as to Defendant James Barber. (sphil, )
July 14, 2025 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by James Barber.(sphil, )
July 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER granting the #10 Status Report Motion. The deadline to file a proposed scheduling order is extended to August 8, 2025. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 7/3/2025. Text Only Entry(mdblc1)
July 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM regarding #10 Motion to Reset and STATUS REPORT RE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER. Motion #10 is referred to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell, by Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 7/3/2025. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
July 2, 2025 Filing 10 MOTION to Reset and STATUS REPORT RE PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Klann, Nicholas) Modified on 7/3/2025 to edit event type. (sphil, ).
June 27, 2025 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. James Barber served on 6/19/2025, answer due 7/10/2025. (Klann, Nicholas)
May 14, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE DEADLINES. Proposed Scheduling Order due 7/7/2025. By Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell on 5/14/2025. (evaug)
May 12, 2025 Filing 7 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (jrobe, )
May 12, 2025 Filing 6 SUMMONS REQUEST as to James Barber by Plaintiff Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Klann, Nicholas)
May 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found #here. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 5/12/25. Text Only Entry (jdyne, )
May 9, 2025 Filing 4 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). No summons issued. (echa, )
May 9, 2025 Filing 3 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell. Text Only Entry. (echa, )
May 9, 2025 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Klann, Nicholas)
May 9, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT against James Barber (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10328664)Attorney Nicholas Bowles Klann added to party Scottsdale Insurance Company(pty:pla), filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Policy, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Klann, Nicholas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Represented By: Nicholas Bowles Klann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Barber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?