Fortin v. DaVita, Inc.
| Stephen Fortin |
| DaVita, Inc. |
| Julian Jenkins and Lydia Perryman |
| 1:2025cv01607 |
| May 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Daniel D Domenico |
| Susan Prose |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 t - Diversity: Torts |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE AND APPOINT CO-LEAD CLASS COUNSEL by Judge Daniel D. Domenico on 16 June 2025. The Motion to Consolidate and Appoint Interim Co-Lead Counsel, Dkt. 16, is granted; the following cases be consolidated under the Jenkins et. al. v. DaVita, Inc., Case No. 25-cv -01358-DDD-SBP case caption: Reid v. DaVita, Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-01362-CYC; Pearson v. DaVita, Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-01488-TPO; Fortin v. DaVita, Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-01607-and PAB-SBP; and Natoli v. DaVita, Inc., Case No. 1:25-cv-01687-SBP.Plaintiffs shall file a Consolidated Amended Complaint within 30 days after the date of entry of this order, which shall be the operative complaint in the Consolidated Action and shall supersede all previous complaints filed in any of the Related Actions. (cmadr, )
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE OF MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES by Interested Parties Julian Jenkins, Lydia Perryman (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Cohen, Bart) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Marc H. Edelson on behalf of Stephen FortinAttorney Marc H. Edelson added to party Stephen Fortin(pty:pla) (Edelson, Marc) |
| Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Stephen Fortin. DaVita, Inc. waiver sent on 5/22/2025, answer due 7/21/2025. (Verderame, Liberato) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, and (4) conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the magistrate judge or on the request of the parties by motion, this court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding, by Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 5/22/2025. Text Only Entry (pabsec, )
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (echa, ) |
| Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Chief Judge Philip A. Brimmer and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DaVita, Inc. (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10349393)Attorney Liberato P. Verderame added to party STEPHEN FORTIN(pty:pla), filed by STEPHEN FORTIN. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Verderame, Liberato) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
