Hopgood (PS) v. Stancil et al
| Marvin Hopgood |
| Andre (Moses) Stancil, CoreCivic, Inc. doing business as Crowley County Correctional Facility (C.C.C.F.), Barry Goodrich, Steven Brown, Hope Marmolejo, Katherine Johnson, Victoria Denbaugh and Daniel Barberos |
| 1:2025cv01765 |
| June 5, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Daniel Barberos, Steven Brown, CoreCivic, Inc., Victoria Denbaugh, Barry Goodrich, Katherine Johnson, Hope Marmolejo, Andre (Moses) Stancil, filed by Marvin Hopgood.(agryan) |
| Filing 12 Letter from Marvin Hopgood. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 09/23/2025. Plaintiffs Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Amended Complaint (ECF No. #10 ) filed September 22, 2025, is GRANTED and Plaintiff shall have up to and including October 30, 2025, to file an amended complaint. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Enlargement of Time to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Marvin Hopgood. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT. It is ordered that Plaintiff shall file, within 30 days from the date of this Order, an amended complaint on the court-approved Prisoner Complaint form. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 08/25/2025. (agryan)
|
| Filing 8 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Marvin Hopgood in the amount of $16.00; Receipt Number 115121; Monthly Payment. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 7
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send a copy of this Order to [email protected]. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 08/05/2025. (Copy sent as ordered.)(jrobe, )
|
| Filing 6 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Marvin Hopgood. (jrobe, ) |
Filing 5
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 07/11/2025. Plaintiff will be given one more opportunity to cure the remaining deficiencies if he wishes to pursue his claims in this action and must do so on or before August 7, 2025. Plaintiff is reminded that the action will be dismissed without further notice if he fails to cure the remaining deficiencies within the time allowed. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 4 AMENDED PRISONER COMPLAINT filed by Marvin Hopgood.(jrobe, ) |
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 6/5/2025. (tlove, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (sadhi, ) |
| Filing 1 LETTER filed by Marvin Hopgood.(sadhi, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.