Schmidt v. One Claim Solution LLC et al
| Nicole Schmidt |
| One Claim Solution LLC and Daniel Doud |
| 1:2025cv02093 |
| July 7, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Charlotte N Sweeney |
| Scott T Varholak |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family and Medical Leave Act |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 17, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER re: #19 Notice of Settlement. Pursuant to the Notice of Settlement, the parties are ordered to submit a Dismissal Paper on or before 1/16/2026. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 12/17/2025. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
|
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement by Defendants Daniel Doud, One Claim Solution LLC (Arnson, Aaron) |
| Filing 18 NOTICE Notice of Service of Discovery by Defendants Daniel Doud, One Claim Solution LLC (Arnson, Aaron) |
|
Filing 17
MINUTE ORDER: A Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/19/2026 at 9:00 AM in Courtroom A 702 before Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney. The parties' Proposed Final Pretrial Order is due by 8/12/2026. In addition to filing, the parties are directed to email the proposed order in editable format to [email protected]. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/19/2025. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
|
|
Filing 16
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 9/16/2025. (schap, )
|
| Filing 15 MINUTE ENTRY for Telephonic Scheduling Conference held before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 9/16/2025. Discovery due by 3/16/2026. Dispositive Motions Notice due by 3/26/2026. FTR: A402. (schap, ) |
| Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by One Claim Solution LLC, Daniel Doud.(Arnson, Aaron) |
| Filing 13 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Nicole Schmidt. (Zinman, Abigail) |
| Filing 12 STATEMENT of Rule 7.1 Disclosure by Plaintiff Nicole Schmidt. (Zinman, Abigail) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Nicole Schmidt All parties do not consent.. (Zinman, Abigail) |
| Filing 10 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Arnson, Aaron) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance Notice of Entry of Appearance by Aaron Dean Arnson on behalf of All Defendants Attorney Aaron Dean Arnson added to party One Claim Solution LLC(pty:dft), Attorney Aaron Dean Arnson added to party Daniel Doud(pty:dft) (Arnson, Aaron) |
| Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Nicole Schmidt. Daniel Doud waiver sent on 7/15/2025, answer due 9/15/2025; One Claim Solution LLC waiver sent on 7/15/2025, answer due 9/15/2025. (Zinman, Abigail) |
|
Filing 7
MINUTE ORDER Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Status Conference set for 9/17/2025 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 402 before Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak is RESET to 9/16/2025 at 10:00 AM. Proposed Scheduling Order due 9/9/2025. If the parties are not available at this new time, they are directed to jointly contact chambers at 303-335-2365 to identify an appropriate time. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 7/9/2025. Text Only Entry (stvlc6, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 07/08/2025. IT IS ORDERED: Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and Local Civil Rule 16.1, the Court shall hold a scheduling conference on: September 17, 2025 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A-402, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. On or before September 10, 2025, the parties shall file a joint proposed scheduling order in the form required pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. (jrobe, )
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found #here. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 7/8/25. Text Only Entry (jdyne, )
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Shelby Sue Woods on behalf of Nicole SchmidtAttorney Shelby Sue Woods added to party Nicole Schmidt(pty:pla) (Woods, Shelby) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND against Daniel Doud, One Claim Solution LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10427677)Attorney Abigail Zinman added to party Nicole Schmidt(pty:pla), filed by Nicole Schmidt. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons One Claim Solution, LLC, #3 Summons Daniel Doud)(Zinman, Abigail) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
