Bickham (PS) v. Red Dot Storage et al
| Devon L. Bickham |
| Fortegra, Clarksville Police Department, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department and Red Dot Storage, LLC |
| 1:2025cv02246 |
| July 21, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Contract: Other |
| 41 U.S.C. § 6503 - Walsh-Healy Act -- Breach of Public Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 NOTICE OF PRO SE E-FILING PRIVILEGES: Plaintiff, Devon L. Bickham, sought and received e-filing privileges on 1/12/2026. All further service will be effectuated electronically via CM/ECF to the email address of record.(Text Only Entry) (lrobe) |
Filing 17
ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 23 December 2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, )
|
|
Filing 16
MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/22/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (norlin, )
|
| Filing 18 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Clarksville Police Department, Fortegra, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, Red Dot Storage, LLC, filed by Devon L. Bickham.(cmadr, ) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT Plaintiff must file, within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, a Third Amended Complaint on the current Court-approved form that complies with this order.n If Plaintiff fails within the time allowed to file a Third Amended Complaint as directed, this action will be dismissed without further notice. Plaintiffs Motion to Proceed and Serve Defendants (ECF No. #12 ) is DENIED without prejudice as premature because this action is in initial review. Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #9 ) is DENIED as moot. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/19/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(norlin, )
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 The Amended Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #5 ) is GRANTED. United States Marshals Service shall serve process on any remaining Defendants for whom personal service is required if the case is later drawn to a district judge and/or a magistrate judge under D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Plaintiff's previous Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. 4) is DENIED as moot. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/19/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(norlin, )
|
| Filing 13 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: #11 Amended Complaint (norlin, ) |
| Filing 12 MOTION TO PROCEED & SERVE DEFENDANTS by Plaintiff Devon L. Bickham. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 11 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Clarksville Police Department, Fortegra, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, Red Dot Storage, LLC, filed by Devon L. Bickham.(norlin, ) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COURT REGARDING RETENTION OF RIGHTS by Plaintiff Devon L. Bickham (norlin, ) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time by Plaintiff Devon L. Bickham. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 8 Response to #7 Motion from Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Devon L. Bickham. (norlin, ) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiencies and File Second Amended Complaint by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 8/25/2025. ORDERED that, if Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies and file a Second Amended Complaint as directed within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. (ggill, )
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Clarksville Police Department, Fortegra, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, Red Dot Storage, LLC, filed by Devon L. Bickham. (pklin, ) |
| Filing 5 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Devon L. Bickham. (norlin, ) |
| Filing 4 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. by Plaintiff Devon L. Bickham. (norlin, ) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES Plaintiff shall cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Any papers that Plaintiff files in response to this order must include the civil action number on this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. The dismissal shall be without prejudice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 7/22/2025. (norlin, )
|
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for a Civil Case against Clarksville Police Department, Fortegra, Montgomery County Sheriff's Department, Red Dot Storage, filed by Devon L. Bickham.(eguth, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
