Blackburn (PS) v. CO. Par. Board et al
| Roger Scott Blackburn |
| Colorado Parole Board |
| 1:2025cv02353 |
| July 30, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Richard T Gurley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 22, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 CERTIFIED MAIL RECEIPT RETURN as to Respondent Colorado Parole Board. (amona,) |
Filing 24
ORDER OF REFERENCE to United States Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, and D.C.COLO.LCivR 72.1,United States Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley is designated to conductproceedings in this civil action. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 1/15/2026. [All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-2353-LTB-RTG]. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (amona, )
|
| Filing 23 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re: #15 Second Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus and #22 Order to File Preliminary Response for service of process. (Attachments: #1 Certified Mail Receipt) (amona,) Modified on 1/15/2026 to correct PDF (amona, ). |
Filing 22
ORDER to File Preliminary Response. ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days from the date of this order Respondent shall file a preliminary response that complies with this order. Within twenty-one (21) days of the filing of the preliminary response Applicant may file a reply. If Respondent does not intend to raise the affirmative defenses of timeliness or exhaustion of state-court remedies, Respondent must notify the Court of that decision in the preliminary response. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 1/15/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (amona,)
|
| Filing 21 Exhibit 36 Petition Form by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (agarc, ) |
Filing 20
MINUTE ORDER. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 1/13/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (amona, )
|
| Filing 19 Petitioner's Second MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit)(amona, ) |
| Filing 18 Petitioner's Second MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (agarc, ) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(agarc, ) |
| Filing 16 Statement of Claims by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(amona, ) |
| Filing 15 Second Amended Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant 28 U.S.C. 2241, by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (Attachments: #1 Table of Authorities) (tlove, ) |
Filing 14
ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO FILE SECOND AMENDED APPLICATION by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/20/2025. It is ORDERED that within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, Applicant must file a Second Amended Application that complies with this Order. If Applicant fails to file a Second Amended Application as directed within the time allowed, the action may be dismissed without further notice. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (tlove, )
|
| Filing 13 Attachment to: Notice to Court for Request to File Exhibit re: #12 Notice by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (tlove, ) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COURT FOR REQUEST TO FILE EXHIBITS by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit) (tlove, ) |
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 9/24/2025. Applicant has sent numerous ex parte email messages to my chambers. Applicant is directed to immediately cease emailing or otherwise contacting chambers. Local Rule 77.2, which concerns ex parte communication with the Court, provides that "[u]nless otherwise ordered, a party to... a proceeding shall not communicate directly about the proceeding in any manner with a judicial officer assigned to the proceeding." D.C.COLO.LCivR 77.2. All matters to be called to a judicial officer's attention shall be submitted through the clerk's office. Any and all information sent directly to a judicial officer will not be considered. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (tlove, )
|
| Filing 10 RESPONSE to Court's Order to Cure Deficiencies by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (tlove, ) |
| Filing 9 Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant 28 U.S.C. 2241, by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (tlove, ) |
Filing 8
SECOND ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 9/15/2025. It is ORDERED that Applicant cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (tlove, )
|
| Filing 7 SECOND MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ELECTRINIC FILING by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (tlove, ) |
| Filing 6 MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ELECTRINIC FILING by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (tlove, ) |
| Filing 5 Filing fee: $ 5, receipt number 115056. (tlove, ) |
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ORDERED that Applicant cure the deficiencies designated above within forty-five days from the date of this Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Applicant's Letter (ECF No. #2 ) requesting that the Court send him Court orders via e-mail is DENIED. If Applicant fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days from the date of this Order, the action will be dismissed without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 7/31/2025. [Copies mailed as ordered]. (tlove, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 LETTER Requesting by Petitioner Roger Scott Blackburn. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 USC 2241, filed by Roger Scott Blackburn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Envelope)(echa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Blackburn (PS) v. CO. Par. Board et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Roger Scott Blackburn | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Colorado Parole Board | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.