Moore (PS) v. Selman et al
Plaintiff: Arthur Moore
Defendant: Richard Selman, Saenz, Moses Stancil and Guy Gosgh
Case Number: 1:2025cv02427
Filed: August 6, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2026 Filing 17 MANDATE of USCA as to #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Arthur Moore : (USCA Case No. 25-1436) (cmadr, )
January 12, 2026 Filing 16 USCA ORDER as to #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Arthur Moore : (USCA Case No. 25-1436) (This document is not the Mandate) This appeal is dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to Tenth Circuit Rules 3.3(B) and 42.1. All pending motions are denied as moot. A copy of this order shall stand as and for the mandate of the court. (cmadr, )
December 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER of USCA as to #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Arthur Moore. (USCA Case No. 25-1436) Mr. Moore must pay the entirety of the $605 appellate filing and docketing fee to the district court on or before January 5, 2026. If Mr. Moore does not pay the entirety of the $605 appellate filing fee to the district court on or before January 5, 2026, the court will dismiss this appeal without any additional notice. (cmadr, )
November 18, 2025 Filing 14 USCA Case Number 25-1436 for #12 Notice of Appeal filed by Arthur Moore. (cmadr, )
November 18, 2025 Filing 13 LETTER Transmitting Notice of Appeal to all counsel advising of the transmittal of the #12 Misdirected Notice of Appeal filed by Arthur Moore to the U.S. Court of Appeals. (Pro Se, Fee not paid and 1915 motion not filed,) (Attachments: #1 Preliminary Record)(cmadr, )
November 14, 2025 Filing 12 Misdirected NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #11 Clerk's Judgment and #10 Order by Plaintiff Arthur Moore. (cmadr, )
November 4, 2025 Filing 11 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #10 Order on 4 November 2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, )
November 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 4 November 2025. ORDERED that the motion captioned Request a Second Ruling (ECF No. #9 ) is denied. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because Plaintiff failed to pay the required filing and administrative fees. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, )
October 14, 2025 Filing 9 Request for a Second Ruling by Plaintiff Arthur Moore. (cmadr, )
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 30 September 2025.ORDERED that the Prisoners Motion and Affidavit for Leave to ProceedPursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #5 ) is denied. It isFURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay $405.00 ($350.00 filing fee, plus a$55.00 administrative fee) within thirty (30) days from the date of this order ifPlaintiff wishes to pursue any claims in this action. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(cmadr, )
September 11, 2025 Filing 7 RESPONSE/MOTION to #6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Plaintiff Arthur Moore. (sphil, )
August 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 26 August 2025. ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing within thirty (30) days from the 5date of this order why leave to proceed in forma pauperis should not be denied pursuant to the filing restriction in 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). It isFURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to show good cause within the time allowed, leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this action will be denied. (cmadr, )
August 22, 2025 Filing 5 Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Arthur Moore. (cmadr, )
August 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ordered that Plaintiff cure all of the deficiencies designated within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. If Plaintiff fails to cure all of the designated deficiencies within thirty (30) days from the date of this order, the action will be dismissed without further notice, by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 08/06/2025. (agryan)
August 6, 2025 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (echa, )
August 6, 2025 Filing 2 NOTICE of Intent by Plaintiff Arthur Moore. (echa, )
August 6, 2025 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Guy Gosgh, Saenz, Richard Selman, Moses Stancil, filed by Arthur Moore.(echa, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Moore (PS) v. Selman et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arthur Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richard Selman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Saenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moses Stancil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guy Gosgh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?