Ford v. General Motors, LLC
| Eric Ford |
| General Motors, LLC |
| 1:2025cv02492 |
| August 12, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Susan Prose |
| Nina Y Wang |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 11/24/2025. Discovery cut-off: 6/1/2026Dispositive Motions/Motions Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702: 7/31/2026 (sjeff)
|
| Filing 19 COURTROOM MINUTES for Scheduling Conference held on 11/24/2025 before Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. Scheduling Order entered. FTR: A 502. (sjeff) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 11/21/2025. In light of this court's order dated October 8, 2025 which reset the scheduling conference to November 24, 2025 (ECF No. 11), Plaintiff's Unopposed #15 Motion to Reset the November 3 scheduling conference is DENIED as moot. Text Only Entry(sjeff)
|
| Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Eric Ford. (Duck, Kevin) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM regarding #15 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Scheduling Conference filed by Eric Ford. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 11/3/2025. Text Only Entry (nywlc9, ) |
| Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Eric Ford. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Duck, Kevin) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER REFERRING CASE: This case is referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the Parties by motion, this Court may direct the Parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at her discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 10/14/2025. Text Only Entry (nywlc9, )
|
| Filing 13 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c). (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #10 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Nina Y. Wang and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. All parties do not consent. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-02492-NYW. (Text Only Entry) (ccuen, ) |
|
Filing 11
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 10/08/2025. In order to accommodate the court's calendar, the Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference previously set for November 3, 2025, is VACATED AND RESET.The Scheduling Conference shall be held on November 24, 2025, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom A-502, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Parties wishing to attend in person may appear in Courtroom A-502, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Parties are permitted to attend telephonically by calling 571-353-2301, Guest meeting ID- 868150043. Any telephonic attendees are requested to mute their phone when not speaking, as well as avoid speaker phone and Bluetooth connections.Proposed scheduling order (including a copy in Word format to # [email protected]) due November 17, 2025. Text Only Entry (sjeff) Modified on 10/9/2025 to correct text (sjeff).
|
| Filing 10 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Eric Ford All parties do not consent.. (Duck, Kevin) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 09/22/2025. Consent form due October 6, 2025. Proposed scheduling order (including a copy in Word format to # [email protected]) due October 27, 2025. The Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) Scheduling Conference shall be held on November 3, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. Parties wishing to attend in person may appear in Courtroom A-502, on the fifth floor of the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse located at 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. Parties are permitted to attend telephonically by calling 571-353-2301, Guest meeting ID- 868150043. Any telephonic attendees are requested to mute their phone when not speaking, as well as avoid speakerphone and Bluetooth connections. (sjeff)
|
| Filing 8 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT identifying Corporate Parent General Motors Company, Corporate Parent General Motors Holdings LLC for General Motors, LLC. (Olsky, David) |
| Filing 7 Defendant's ANSWER to #1 Complaint, Filed by General Motors, LLC.(Olsky, David) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance Filed by David Fox Olsky on behalf of General Motors, LLCAttorney David Fox Olsky added to party General Motors, LLC(pty:dft) (Olsky, David) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eric Ford. General Motors, LLC served on 8/13/2025, answer due 9/3/2025. (Duck, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM RETURNING CASE. Case randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for all further proceedings. Judge R. Brooke Jackson is no longer assigned to case. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-02492-SBP. (ccuen, ) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, ) |
| Filing 2 Case assigned to Judge R. Brooke Jackson and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry (eguth, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against General Motors, LLC (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10489687)Attorney Kevin R. Duck added to party Eric Ford(pty:pla), filed by Eric Ford. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Summons)(Duck, Kevin) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ford v. General Motors, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric Ford | |
| Represented By: | Kevin R. Duck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: General Motors, LLC | |
| Represented By: | David Fox Olsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
