NetChoice v. Weiser
| NetChoice |
| Phillip J. Weiser |
| 1:2025cv02538 |
| August 14, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| William J Martinez |
| Kathryn A Starnella |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 25
ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the upcoming October 16, 2025 oral argument hearing ("Hearing") on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction ("Motion") #15 . Counsel are advised that the Court will utilize the following procedure at the Hearing: Each party will have up to 25 minutes for the opening portion of its or his argument, to be followed by questions of counsel by the Court. After a brief recess, Defendant will have up to 10 minutes for the rebuttal portion of his argument and, because it has the burden on the Motion, Plaintiff will be permitted the final rebuttal portion of its argument of up to 15 minutes. Finally, the Court ORDERS that the time for the Hearing will be moved up one hour, to 9:30 a.m. on October 16, 2025, in Courtroom A801. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 10/9/2025. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
Filing 24
REPLY to Response to #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiff NetChoice. (Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Filing 23
BRIEF in Opposition to #15 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Defendant Phillip J. Weiser. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Excerpt from Hearing on HB24-1136)(Baumann, Peter)
|
Filing 22
MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 4 September 2025. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#20] is GRANTED. The Scheduling Conference set for November 17, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to December 18, 2025, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, Fifth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than December 11, 2025, the parties shall submit their proposed scheduling order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants deadline to Answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs Complaint is extended to November 6, 2025.(cmadr, )
|
Filing 21
MEMORANDUM regarding #20 Joint MOTION for Order to Extend Deadlines filed by Phillip J. Weiser, NetChoice. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella by Judge William J. Martinez on 9/3/2025. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
Filing 20
Joint MOTION for Order to Extend Deadlines by Plaintiff NetChoice, Defendant Phillip J. Weiser. (Baumann, Peter)
|
Filing 19
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Lane Towery on behalf of Phillip J. WeiserAttorney Lane Towery added to party Phillip J. Weiser(pty:dft) (Towery, Lane)
|
Filing 18
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Peter G. Baumann on behalf of Phillip J. WeiserAttorney Peter G. Baumann added to party Phillip J. Weiser(pty:dft) (Baumann, Peter)
|
Filing 17
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Lauren Marie Dickey on behalf of Phillip J. WeiserAttorney Lauren Marie Dickey added to party Phillip J. Weiser(pty:dft) (Dickey, Lauren)
|
Filing 16
ORDER: This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff NetChoice's Opposed Motion for Preliminary Injunction #15 ("Motion"). Defendant has up to and including September 19, 2025 within which to file a Response to the Motion. Plaintiff's Reply in support of the Motion is due on or before October 3, 2025. Oral argument on the Motion is hereby SET for October 16, 2025 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom A801. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/21/2025. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
Filing 15
MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff NetChoice. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion, #2 Ex. 1 - Text of Enacted Law, #3 Ex. 2 - Cleland (NetChoice) Declaration, #4 Ex. 3 - Blumenfeld (YouTube) Declaration, #5 Ex. 4 - Geary (Snap) Declaration, #6 Ex. 5 - Murphy (Meta) Declaration)(Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff NetChoice's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages ("Motion") #7 . The Motion is GRANTED IN PART for good cause shown. Plaintiff is granted leave to file its Motion for Preliminary Injunction not to exceed 25 pages, exclusive of the table of contents, attorney signature blocks, and certificate of service. As a consequence, Plaintiff's present Motion for Preliminary Injunction #8 is STRICKEN without prejudice to refiling in strict compliance with the above length restrictions. Defendant Weiser is GRANTED leave to file a response of the same length to Plaintiff's anticipated refiled Motion for Preliminary Injunction. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/19/2025. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
Filing 13
SUMMONS Returned Executed by NetChoice. Phillip J. Weiser served on 8/14/2025, answer due 9/4/2025. (Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Filing 12
ORDER Setting Scheduling/Planning Conference. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a Scheduling/Planning Conference pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b) shall be held on November 17, 2025, commencing at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom A-501, Fifth Floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado 80294, by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 08/18/2025. (Attachments: #1 Instructions for Preparation of Scheduling Order, #2 Proposed Scheduling Order, #3 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (agryan)
|
Filing 11
ORDER: Counsel for the parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Revised Practice Standards (as most recently revised effective December 1, 2022 and as they may be amended from time to time), which may be downloaded #here. Counsel shall also review and familiarize themselves with the Practice Standards of the Magistrate Judge assigned in the referral role in this case. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/18/2025. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
Filing 10
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella, or such other Magistrate Judge who may in the future be reassigned to this case, is designated to conduct NDISPO proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). ALSO ORDERED that unless service has otherwise been completed or arranged, Plaintiff's counsel is directed to effect service of the summons and complaint pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure no later than 30 days from the date of this Referral Order, in order for the initial scheduling conference to be held promptly. Court sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the recommendation or informal request of the Magistrate Judge or on the request of the parties by motion, the court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. SO ORDERED by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/18/2025. Text Only Entry (wjmja, )
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jared B. Magnuson on behalf of NetChoiceAttorney Jared B. Magnuson added to party NetChoice(pty:pla) (Magnuson, Jared)
|
Filing 8
STRICKEN MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Hearing requested; Relief requested before January 1, 2026 by Plaintiff NetChoice. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Text of Enacted Law, #3 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Cleland (NetChoice) Declaration, #4 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Blumenfeld (YouTube) Declaration, #5 Exhibit Ex. 4 - Geary (Snap) Declaration, #6 Exhibit Ex. 5 - Murphy (Meta) Declaration)(Maltz, Jeremy) Modified to strike pursuant to 14 Order on 8/19/2025 (jrobe, ).
|
Filing 7
Unopposed MOTION for Leave to file Overlength Preliminary Injunction Motion by Plaintiff NetChoice. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS issued by Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form) (eguth, )
|
Filing 5
Case assigned to Judge William J. Martinez and drawn to Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella. Text Only Entry (eguth, )
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Jeremy Evan Maltz on behalf of NetChoice (Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Filing 3
CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. (Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Filing 2
SUMMONS REQUEST as to Philip J. Weiser, in his official capacity as Attorney General of Colorado by Plaintiff NetChoice. (Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against Phillip J. Weiser (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10495228)Attorney Jeremy Evan Maltz added to party NetChoice(pty:pla), filed by NetChoice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Text of Enacted Law, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Maltz, Jeremy)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: NetChoice v. Weiser | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: NetChoice | |
| Represented By: | Jeremy Evan Maltz |
| Represented By: | Jared B. Magnuson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Phillip J. Weiser | |
| Represented By: | Peter G. Baumann |
| Represented By: | Lauren Marie Dickey |
| Represented By: | Lane Towery |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.