White (PS) v. Long et al
Petitioner: Larry White
Respondent: Jeff Long, Gilbert Caley, Anthony Russuel and William Sherwood
Case Number: 1:2025cv02717
Filed: August 29, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 5, 2026 Filing 12 AFFIDAVIT Pursuant to 28 USCS #144 Recusal of Maj. Judge. Richard T. Gurley by Petitioner Larry White. (echa, )
February 5, 2026 Filing 11 MOTION to Disqualify, Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.S #455 et seq. 2025 by Petitioner Larry White. (echa, )
February 5, 2026 Filing 10 Plaintiff's OBJECTION to Dismiss, Under 28 USCS. 636 #8 Order of Dismissal by Petitioner Larry White. (echa, )
January 9, 2026 Filing 9 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #8 Order of Dismissal on 01/09/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
January 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order of Dismissal by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 01/09/2026. ORDERED that the action is dismissed without prejudice for failure to cure the deficiencies and failure to prosecute. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. No certificate of appealability will issue. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
December 11, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11 December 2025. Applicants Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. #6 ) is granted. Applicant shall have up to and including January 2, 2026 to cure the deficiencies as directed in the Courts November 12, 2025 Order. Applicant is reminded that if he fails to cure all of the deficiencies as directed within the time allowed, the action will be dismissed without further notice. No further extensions of time will be granted without good cause. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(cmadr, )
December 5, 2025 Filing 6 MOTION for Extension of Time by Petitioner Larry White. (cmadr, )
November 12, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SECOND ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. Applicant's "Motion to Rescind the Court's Order to Cure Deficiencies for Plaintiff's Notice for Injunctive Relief under Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(a)" (ECF No. #4 ) is DENIED. If Applicant desires to proceed with a habeas action at this time, he shall cure the deficiencies designated above within 30 days from the date of this Order. Any papers that Applicant files in response to this Order must include the civil action number on this Order. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/12/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(ccuen, )
September 29, 2025 Filing 4 MOTION to Rescind #3 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Petitioner Larry White. (cmadr, )
September 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER DIRECTING APPLICANT TO CURE DEFICIENCIES by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 4 September 2025. ORDERED that if Applicant desires to proceed with a habeas action at this time,he shall cure the deficiencies designated above within 30 days from the date of thisOrder. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (cmadr, )
August 29, 2025 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (eguth, )
August 29, 2025 Filing 1 NOTICE of Motion for Preliminary Injunction Under Fed.R.Civ.P.-R. 65(a) by Petitioner Larry White (eguth, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: White (PS) v. Long et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Larry White
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jeff Long
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Gilbert Caley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Anthony Russuel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: William Sherwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?