Thompson v. Colorado Christian University
Plaintiff: Diane Thompson
Defendant: Colorado Christian University
Case Number: 1:2025cv03046
Filed: September 29, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Cyrus Y Chung
Referring Judge: S Kato Crews
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Gender)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 24, 2026 Filing 30 REPLY to Response to #26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Defendant Colorado Christian University. (Michels, John)
February 10, 2026 Filing 29 RESPONSE to #26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Plaintiff Diane Thompson. (Young, Myles)
January 26, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting #27 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. For good cause, the deadline for Plaintiff to respond to the #26 Motion to Dismiss is extended to on or before February 10, 2026. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 1/26/2026. Text Only Entry(skcja, )
January 23, 2026 Filing 27 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Plaintiff Diane Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Document)(Young, Myles)
January 6, 2026 Filing 26 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Colorado Christian University. (Michels, John)
December 23, 2025 Filing 25 AMENDED COMPLAINT (Redlined) against Colorado Christian University, filed by Diane Thompson.(Young, Myles)
December 22, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER In light of the filing of #23 First Amended Complaint and Jury Demand, #18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is now moot. On or before December 24, 2025, Plaintiff shall file a red-line version of the First Amended Complaint. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 12/22/2025. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
December 22, 2025 Filing 23 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Colorado Christian University, filed by Diane Thompson.(Young, Myles)
December 3, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 22 SCHEDULING ORDER by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 12/3/2025. Discovery is due by 8/4/2026. Dispositive Motions are due by 8/18/2026. (spric)
December 3, 2025 Filing 21 MINUTE ENTRY for Scheduling Conference held on 12/3/2025 before Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung.The Notice to Court Regarding Previous Filing of Appearance for Thomas Newkirk and Motion to Appear by Phone by Plaintiff, ECF No. #19 , is GRANTED. FTR: C205. (spric)
December 3, 2025 Filing 20 MEMORANDUM regarding #19 MOTION for Leave to Appear filed by Diane Thompson. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 12/3/2025. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
December 3, 2025 Filing 19 NOTICE to Court Regarding Previous Filing of Appearance for Thomas Newkirk and Motion to Appear by Phone by Plaintiff Diane Thompson (Young, Myles) Modified on 12/3/2025 to add gavel (skcja, ).
December 2, 2025 Filing 18 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Defendant Colorado Christian University. (Michels, John)
November 26, 2025 Filing 17 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Diane Thompson. (Young, Myles)
November 25, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER: The plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Phone Conference, ECF No. #14 , is GRANTED for good cause shown. A Scheduling Conference is set for 12/3/2025 at 11:30 AM. Mr. Young shall join the conference by dialing 571-353-2301 and then entering 198033559#. Any party appearing by telephone shall mute their telephone until the conference begins and at any time they are not speaking. Any other parties wishing to appear by telephone should demonstrate their own good cause for not appearing in person. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 11/25/2025. Text Only Entry (tlove, )
November 24, 2025 Filing 15 MEMORANDUM regarding #14 Unopposed MOTION for Hearing/Conference via Telephone filed by Diane Thompson. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 11/24/2025. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
November 24, 2025 Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Hearing/Conference via Telephone by Plaintiff Diane Thompson. (Young, Myles)
November 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, and (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. Court-sponsored alternative dispute resolution is governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.6. On the request of the parties by motion, this Court may direct the parties to engage in an early neutral evaluation, a settlement conference, or another alternative dispute resolution proceeding. Alternatively, the Magistrate Judge, at their discretion, may convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Counsel for the Parties and all counsel who may later enter an appearance shall review and familiarize themselves with the undersigned's Standing Order and Practice Standards, as well as the Practice Standards of the assigned Magistrate Judge. By Judge S. Kato Crews on 11/19/2025. Text Only Entry (skcja, )
November 19, 2025 Filing 12 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #11 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. This case is randomly reassigned to Judge S. Kato Crews and drawn to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. All parties do not consent. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-3046-SKC. (Text Only Entry) (tlove, )
November 19, 2025 Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Plaintiff Diane Thompson All parties do not consent.. (Young, Myles)
November 12, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Tyler Garrett Respondek on behalf of Colorado Christian UniversityAttorney Tyler Garrett Respondek added to party Colorado Christian University(pty:dft) (Respondek, Tyler)
November 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Minute Order: This matter is before the Court sua sponte. Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, the Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2025 at 11:15 a.m is hereby RESET to 12/3/2025 at 11:30 a.m. This is a change in time only. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 11/7/2025. Text Only Entry (spric) Modified on 11/7/2025 (spric, ).
October 21, 2025 Filing 8 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance of John J. Michels Jr. by John J. Michels, Jr on behalf of Colorado Christian UniversityAttorney John J. Michels, Jr added to party Colorado Christian University(pty:dft) (Michels, John)
October 8, 2025 Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Diane Thompson. Colorado Christian University waiver sent on 10/3/2025, answer due 12/2/2025. (Young, Myles)
October 2, 2025 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance of Myles D. Young by Plaintiff Diane Thompson (Young, Myles)
October 2, 2025 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance of Tom Newkirk by Plaintiff Diane Thompson (Newkirk, Thomas)
September 30, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER: The above captioned case has been directly assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1. Magistrate Consent Form due by 11/19/2025. Proposed Scheduling Order due 11/26/2025. Scheduling Conference set for 12/3/2025 11:15 AM in Courtroom C205 before Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff shall notify all Parties who have not entered an appearance of the date and time of the Scheduling Conference. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 9/30/2025. (tlove, )
September 29, 2025 Filing 3 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. No summons submitted; no summons issued. Completed summons may be filed for issuance using the event "Summons Request". (echa, )
September 29, 2025 Filing 2 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung. Text Only Entry (echa, )
September 29, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and jury demand against Colorado Christian University (Filing fee $ 405,Receipt Number ACODC-10581571)Attorney Robert Mark Liechty added to party Diane Thompson(pty:pla), filed by Diane Thompson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Liechty, Robert)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Thompson v. Colorado Christian University
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Thompson
Represented By: Robert Mark Liechty
Represented By: Myles D. Young
Represented By: Thomas A. Newkirk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Colorado Christian University
Represented By: Tyler Garrett Respondek
Represented By: John J. Michels, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?