Stetzel v. Stancil et al
Plaintiff: Philip E. Stetzel
Defendant: Moses Stancil, Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley and Amanda Retting
Case Number: 1:2025cv03349
Filed: October 23, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Susan Prose
Referring Judge: Charlotte N Sweeney
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 10, 2026 Filing 22 REPLY to Response to #16 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 1) filed by Defendants Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil. (Synsvoll, Christopher)
February 26, 2026 Filing 21 Plaintiff's Reply/Objection to #16 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Plaintiff Philip E. Stetzel. (agarc, )
February 24, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for all motions. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions, and (5) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found #here. The pending Motion to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 1), ECF No. #16 , is referred to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 2/24/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry (cnsja, )
February 24, 2026 Filing 19 CASE REASSIGNED Pursuant to #18 Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Case randomly reassigned to Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney and drawn to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose. All parties do not consent. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-03349-CNS. (Text Only Entry) (ccuen, )
February 23, 2026 Filing 18 CONSENT to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge by Defendants Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil All parties do not consent.. (Synsvoll, Christopher)
February 9, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 02/09/2026. For good cause shown, the Defendants' #14 Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit and #15 Second Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise respond are GRANTED, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is accepted as filed.The parties shall file a completed Magistrate Judge Consent Form, available at ECF No. 6, by February 23, 2026.This court notes sua sponte that Defendants' #16 Motion to Dismiss asserts qualified immunity as a defense. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(2), this court finds good cause to delay issuing the scheduling order until after the motion is are resolved. See Lucero v. City of Aurora, No. 23-cv-00851-GPG-SBP, 2023 WL 5957126, at *3 (D. Colo. Sept. 13, 2023) ("[T]o free officials from the concerns of litigation, including 'avoidance of disruptive discovery,' discovery must be stayed upon [an] assertion of qualified immunity, even if there are claims (or defendants) that are not subject to a qualified immunity defense 'to ensure the case does not develop in a misleading or slanted way that causes prejudice to'" the defendant(s) who assert qualified immunity.") (cleaned up, quoting Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 685-86 (2009)). For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(sjeff)
February 6, 2026 Filing 16 MOTION to Dismiss Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 1) by Defendants Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil. (Synsvoll, Christopher)
January 27, 2026 Filing 15 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendants Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil. (Synsvoll, Christopher)
January 26, 2026 Filing 14 MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limit by Defendants Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil. (Synsvoll, Christopher)
December 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER GRANTING Defendants' #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by Magistrate Judge Susan Prose on 12/26/2025. The CDOC Officials shall file their responsive pleading on or before January 29, 2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(sjeff)
December 23, 2025 Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond re #1 Complaint by Defendants Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil. (Synsvoll, Christopher)
November 21, 2025 Filing 11 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Amy E.B. Adams on behalf of Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses StancilAttorney Amy E.B. Adams added to party Siobhan Burtlow(pty:dft), Attorney Amy E.B. Adams added to party Jordan Hartley(pty:dft), Attorney Amy E.B. Adams added to party Amanda Retting(pty:dft), Attorney Amy E.B. Adams added to party Moses Stancil(pty:dft) (Adams, Amy)
November 21, 2025 Filing 10 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Christopher B. Synsvoll on behalf of Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses StancilAttorney Christopher B. Synsvoll added to party Siobhan Burtlow(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher B. Synsvoll added to party Jordan Hartley(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher B. Synsvoll added to party Amanda Retting(pty:dft), Attorney Christopher B. Synsvoll added to party Moses Stancil(pty:dft) (Synsvoll, Christopher)
November 14, 2025 Filing 9 PAYMENT RECEIVED from State of Colorado in the amount of $ 12.45; Receipt Number 116115. (ggill, )
October 31, 2025 Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Philip E. Stetzel. Siobhan Burtlow waiver sent on 10/31/2025, answer due 12/30/2025; Jordan Hartley waiver sent on 10/31/2025, answer due 12/30/2025; Amanda Retting waiver sent on 10/31/2025, answer due 12/30/2025; Moses Stancil waiver sent on 10/31/2025, answer due 12/30/2025. (ccuen, )
October 31, 2025 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of Service by Clerk of Court re: #1 Prisoner Complaint, #5 Order Drawing Case for Service of Process. (ccuen, )
October 31, 2025 Filing 6 Magistrate Judge consent form issued pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 40.1, direct assignment of civil actions to full time magistrate judges. (pklin, )
October 31, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order Drawing Case by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 10/31/2025. After review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(b), the Court has determined that this case does not appear to be appropriate for summary dismissal. Therefore, the case will be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. See D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1(c). Accordingly, it is ordered that this case be drawn to a presiding judge and, if applicable, to a magistrate judge. (This case has been randomly reassigned to Magistrate Judge Susan B. Prose for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-03349-SBP.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
October 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 24 October 2025. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of this order [email protected]. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(cmadr, )
October 23, 2025 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (eguth, )
October 23, 2025 Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Philip E. Stetzel. (eguth, )
October 23, 2025 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Siobhan Burtlow, Jordan Hartley, Amanda Retting, Moses Stancil, filed by Philip E. Stetzel.(eguth, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stetzel v. Stancil et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Philip E. Stetzel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Moses Stancil
Represented By: Christopher B. Synsvoll
Represented By: Amy E.B. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Siobhan Burtlow
Represented By: Christopher B. Synsvoll
Represented By: Amy E.B. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jordan Hartley
Represented By: Christopher B. Synsvoll
Represented By: Amy E.B. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amanda Retting
Represented By: Christopher B. Synsvoll
Represented By: Amy E.B. Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?