Alamillo-Gonzales (PS) v. Tucker
Plaintiff: Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales
Defendant: Adam Tucker
Case Number: 1:2025cv03396
Filed: October 27, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado
Presiding Judge: Lewis T Babcock
Referring Judge: Richard T Gurley
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights (U.S. not a defendant)
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 20, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 20, 2026 Filing 15 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales in the amount of $ 24.21; Receipt Number 117734; Monthly Payment. (eluce, )
March 16, 2026 Filing 14 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales in the amount of $ 10.00; Receipt Number 117370; Monthly Payment. (echa, )
February 17, 2026 Filing 13 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales in the amount of $ 10.00; Receipt Number 117060; Monthly Payment. (agryan)
January 14, 2026 Filing 12 LETTER by Plaintiff Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales. (cmadr, )
January 9, 2026 Filing 11 PAYMENT RECEIVED in the amount of $ 14.60; Receipt Number 116647. (ggill, )
December 4, 2025 Filing 10 PAYMENT RECEIVED in the amount of $ 51.70; Receipt Number 116300; Initial Payment. (norlin, )
December 4, 2025 Filing 9 'JUDGMENT re: #8 Order on Report and Recommendations, by Clerk on 12/4/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (norlin, )
December 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER The Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. #7 ) is accepted and adopted. the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the action are dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). by Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 12/4/2025. leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied without prejudice to the filing of a motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(norlin, )
November 10, 2025 Filing 7 RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE For the reasons set forth herein, it is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the Prisoner Complaint (ECF No. #1 ) and the action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/10/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (norlin, )
November 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) herein. No additional orders of reference are necessary. All motions, requests, letters, and any other document seeking court action are referred automatically for resolution or recommendation by the named magistrate judge. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 11/7/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (norlin, )
November 6, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Minute Order by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/06/2025. Pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1, the Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock. The undersigned will remain as the assigned magistrate judge. (This case has been directly reassigned to Senior Judge Lewis T. Babcock and drawn to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for all further proceedings. All future pleadings should be designated as 25-cv-03396-LTB.) For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (pklin, )
November 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1915 The Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915 (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/5/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(norlin, )[order mailed as directed]
October 27, 2025 Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (b). Text Only Entry. (eluce, )
October 27, 2025 Filing 2 Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. by Plaintiff Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(eluce, )
October 27, 2025 Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT against Adam Tucker, filed by Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(eluce, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alamillo-Gonzales (PS) v. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adrian Alamillo-Gonzales
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?