Thomas (PS) v. District Court, El Paso County, Colorado et al
| Bryan Calvin Thomas and Bryan C. Thomas |
| District Court, El Paso County, Colorado, Michael J. Allen, William B. Bain, Sheri King, D. Lacy and Mona Mattix |
| 1:2025cv03445 |
| October 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado |
| Lewis T Babcock |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 14, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER OF DISMISSAL it is ORDERED that the Complaint (ECF No. #5 ) and this action are dismissed without prejudice as barred by the rule of Heck v. Humphrey. It is FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED for the purpose of appeal. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. If Plaintiff files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $605 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. By Judge Lewis T. Babcock on 01/14/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT by Clerk re: #9 Order. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. 1915 AND DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE. It is ORDERED that the Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) (ECF No. #2 ) is granted. It isFURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff show cause in writing within thirty (30) days from the date of this order why the action should not be dismissed as barred by Heck. It is FURTHER ORDERED that if Plaintiff fails to show good cause within the time allowed the action may be dismissed without further notice. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 12/04/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(jrobe, )
|
| Filing 7 Exhibit by Plaintiff Bryan Calvin Thomas. (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 6 LETTER by Plaintiff Bryan Calvin Thomas. (jrobe, ) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT filed by Bryan Calvin Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(jrobe, ) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO CURE DEFICIENCIES. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff cure the deficiencies designated above within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. By Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 11/04/2025. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (jrobe, )
|
| Filing 3 Case assigned to Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley for Initial Review pursuant to D.C.COLO.LCivR 8.1 (a). Text Only Entry. (echa, ) |
| Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) by Plaintiff Bryan Calvin Thomas. (echa, ) |
| Filing 1 Verified Federal Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Michael J. Allen, William B. Bain, District Court, El Paso County, Colorado, Sheri King, D. Lacy, Mona Mattix, filed by Bryan Calvin Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summonses)(echa, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
